Title | Posted |
---|---|
PICAs and military manpower needs | Feb 2008 |
Climax to the Battle of Manticore | Jan 2008 |
Baron High Ridge's fate | Dec 2007 |
<em>Saganami-C</em> vs a pre-war superdreadnought | Dec 2007 |
Safeholdian ship design | Mar 2007 |
Pre-war alliance strategy | Feb 2007 |
Deep-penetration & commerce raiding strategy | Feb 2007 |
Deep-penetration strategy | Feb 2007 |
Strategic attrition | Feb 2007 |
<em>Nike </em>(big BC) clarification | Nov 2006 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Is anyone going to build a single-drive missile with a fusion power plant?
Almost certainly not. A fusion plant is larger than the capacitors required to store the energy required by a single-drive missile. It's smaller than the multiple capacitors required to power the multiple drive systems of an MDM. In addition, adding the necessary hardware to kickstart the fusion plant before launch would require a substantial up-sizing of the launchers firing them. The only real argument in favor of putting a fusion plant aboard a single-drive missile would be that it would provide both the power density and the endurance required to take full advantage of the EW capabilities provided by Ghost Rider. That isn't a minor consideration, but for a ship which would be firing single-drive missiles, that's not likely to be as significant a concern. Those vessels are going to be smaller and less capable, whatever they do. If the idea is that somehow switching to a fusion-plant drive and single-drive missile would produce a smaller single-drive weapon, that wouldn't happen.