Title | Posted |
---|---|
Misconceptions about Torch | Jun 2008 |
Point defense laser clusters | Jun 2008 |
The League vs the Star Empire of Manticore: <em>Who declares war on who?</em> | Jun 2008 |
Status of the Solarian League Navy | Jun 2008 |
The Cherwell Convention's Equipment Clause | May 2008 |
White Haven's relief mission to Yeltsin | May 2008 |
Escort CLACs | May 2008 |
Capital ships and raiding defenses | May 2008 |
Map of the planet Safehold (as of <em>By Schism Rent Asunder</em>) | May 2008 |
Removing Giancola from office | Feb 2008 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Is anyone going to build a single-drive missile with a fusion power plant?
Almost certainly not. A fusion plant is larger than the capacitors required to store the energy required by a single-drive missile. It's smaller than the multiple capacitors required to power the multiple drive systems of an MDM. In addition, adding the necessary hardware to kickstart the fusion plant before launch would require a substantial up-sizing of the launchers firing them. The only real argument in favor of putting a fusion plant aboard a single-drive missile would be that it would provide both the power density and the endurance required to take full advantage of the EW capabilities provided by Ghost Rider. That isn't a minor consideration, but for a ship which would be firing single-drive missiles, that's not likely to be as significant a concern. Those vessels are going to be smaller and less capable, whatever they do. If the idea is that somehow switching to a fusion-plant drive and single-drive missile would produce a smaller single-drive weapon, that wouldn't happen.