Title | Posted |
---|---|
Effectiveness of cruisers-vs-battlecruisers | Feb 2003 |
<em>Wayfarer </em>and camouflaging itself as a merchantman | Feb 2003 |
"Buckshot" missile defenses | Jan 2003 |
Why doesn't Elizabeth <em>pack</em> the Lords? | Dec 2002 |
Administrative and tactical organization of the RMN | Dec 2002 |
Fission/fusion power reactors | Dec 2002 |
Counter-missile canisters | Dec 2002 |
Counter-missile fire control issues and counter-missile pods | Dec 2002 |
Does the Manticoran Peerage allow Proxy Voting | Dec 2002 |
Manticoran Peerage seating | Nov 2002 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
I'd have to say that would not be a good idea. For one thing,
they're bigger than some of you seem to be assuming. In point of fact, the Manties' present capital-ship missile pods are considerably larger than a pinnace or an assault shuttle. In fact, they're a little more than half the beam of a standard DD in their widest dimension, which is why Wayfarer could deploy no more of them
simultaneously and why a pod-SD (by the way, I like the term; I hadn't thought of it for myself. Perhaps we should call them SD(P) from now on?