Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Artificial divisions within the SLN | Mar 2004 |
| The Battle of Farley's Crossing | Mar 2004 |
| <em>Gauntlet</em>'s weapons fit | Mar 2004 |
| Erewhon and the inertial compensator | Apr 2004 |
| Battleship and SD(P) comparisons | Apr 2004 |
| System control ships | Apr 2004 |
| Grav pulse comm post <em>Ashes of Victory</em> | Apr 2004 |
| Artificial intelligence and nanotechnology | Apr 2004 |
| Shipyard types | Jun 2004 |
| <em>Medusa-Bs</em> | Jun 2004 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Asymmetrical broadsides
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: October 22, 2002
Why Are Starships Symmetrical? The question of why ships aren't designed with separate broadsides optimized for different types of combat -- that is, missile-range combat as opposed to energy-range combat -- has emerged once again. Do you want to comment on this one at all?
Symmetrical Broadsides. No, I don't want to comment on this. I've done it before, and the statements I made then still apply. Indeed, they've become even more relevant in an era in which broadside missile tubes are becoming less and less significant for major combatants and the need for missile defenses has never been greater. Asymmetrical broadsides would be a bad idea.
