Title | Posted |
---|---|
Masada and the Eridani Edict | Jul 2004 |
Honor's Second Marsh strategy | Aug 2004 |
c-Fractional missile attack plan | Aug 2004 |
Energy-siphon effect | Aug 2004 |
How big is a recon drone? | Aug 2004 |
Wedge interaction | Aug 2004 |
Counter-missile pods and two-stage counter-missiles | Aug 2004 |
Wedge-killer missiles | Aug 2004 |
Treecat toenails | Aug 2004 |
Admiral Hemphil and <em>Fearless'</em> deployment | Aug 2004 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Why Are Starships Symmetrical? The question of why ships aren't designed with separate broadsides optimized for different types of combat -- that is, missile-range combat as opposed to energy-range combat -- has emerged once again. Do you want to comment on this one at all?
Symmetrical Broadsides. No, I don't want to comment on this. I've done it before, and the statements I made then still apply. Indeed, they've become even more relevant in an era in which broadside missile tubes are becoming less and less significant for major combatants and the need for missile defenses has never been greater. Asymmetrical broadsides would be a bad idea.