Title | Posted |
---|---|
How much does the SLN know about the Havenite War? | Oct 2002 |
How is the Solarian League organized? | Oct 2002 |
How do tight budgets affect the Solarian League Navy? | Oct 2002 |
What are the League/Solarian League Navy financial resources? | Oct 2002 |
<em>Starfire </em>gaming system I | Oct 2002 |
Warp points | Oct 2002 |
Using debris as a 'warp point denial system' | Oct 2002 |
Drive field requirement for warp transit | Oct 2002 |
Warp point denial I | Oct 2002 |
Warp point denial II | Oct 2002 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
To the nameless Fly who sent me the e-mail pointing out (a) that the Mesan spider-drive ships mounting the attack on Manticore couldn't possibly tank enough reaction mass for the mission and (b) that the flare of their fusion drives would completely negate any stealth advantages of the spider drive itself, I will simply say that the spider drive ships do not use reaction drives. The scout ships do use reaction thrusters to propel themselves out of the freighter bays in which they were transported to Manticore, but we've seen Honorverse impeller drive ships using reaction thrusters to maneuver lots of times before. In short, this is not going to be a case of Honor's tactics at Cerberus, although some of the same "blind spots" which afflicted General Chernock's units at Cerberus do have parallels in Manticore's preparedness. (And, no, one of those blind spots is not a failure to look for visual cues from little things like massed fusion thrusters.)