Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Acceleration by ship mass | Jun 2009 |
| Effective speed by hyper band | Jun 2009 |
| Hyper Limits by stellar spectral class | Jun 2009 |
| Prolong effects | Jun 2009 |
| Capital missiles, multi-stage missiles, and missile pods | Jun 2009 |
| Counter-missile fire control issues | Jun 2009 |
| Hyper generator modes of operation | Jun 2009 |
| Safehold Map | Jul 2009 |
| How the Safehold series won't end (Thu Apr 18, 2013) | Dec 2013 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Single-drive fusion-powered missiles
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: November 14, 2004
Is anyone going to build a single-drive missile with a fusion power plant?
Almost certainly not. A fusion plant is larger than the capacitors required to store the energy required by a single-drive missile. It's smaller than the multiple capacitors required to power the multiple drive systems of an MDM. In addition, adding the necessary hardware to kickstart the fusion plant before launch would require a substantial up-sizing of the launchers firing them. The only real argument in favor of putting a fusion plant aboard a single-drive missile would be that it would provide both the power density and the endurance required to take full advantage of the EW capabilities provided by Ghost Rider. That isn't a minor consideration, but for a ship which would be firing single-drive missiles, that's not likely to be as significant a concern. Those vessels are going to be smaller and less capable, whatever they do. If the idea is that somehow switching to a fusion-plant drive and single-drive missile would produce a smaller single-drive weapon, that wouldn't happen.
