Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Detection of upward hyper translations | May 2009 |
| c-Fractional pod-based missile attack plan II | May 2009 |
| Erewhon and the inertial compensator | May 2009 |
| Safeholdian ship design | May 2009 |
| PICAs and military manpower needs | May 2009 |
| Operation Ark's mission plan | May 2009 |
| Church communications | May 2009 |
| The missing figures from the Honorverse CD-release of <em>More Than Honor</em>. | May 2009 |
| Reportage of Honor's 'trial' by the Committee of Public Safety | May 2009 |
| Treecat intelligence II | Apr 2009 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Single-drive fusion-powered missiles
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: November 14, 2004
Is anyone going to build a single-drive missile with a fusion power plant?
Almost certainly not. A fusion plant is larger than the capacitors required to store the energy required by a single-drive missile. It's smaller than the multiple capacitors required to power the multiple drive systems of an MDM. In addition, adding the necessary hardware to kickstart the fusion plant before launch would require a substantial up-sizing of the launchers firing them. The only real argument in favor of putting a fusion plant aboard a single-drive missile would be that it would provide both the power density and the endurance required to take full advantage of the EW capabilities provided by Ghost Rider. That isn't a minor consideration, but for a ship which would be firing single-drive missiles, that's not likely to be as significant a concern. Those vessels are going to be smaller and less capable, whatever they do. If the idea is that somehow switching to a fusion-plant drive and single-drive missile would produce a smaller single-drive weapon, that wouldn't happen.
