Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Effectiveness of cruisers-vs-battlecruisers | Feb 2003 |
| <em>Wayfarer </em>and camouflaging itself as a merchantman | Feb 2003 |
| "Buckshot" missile defenses | Jan 2003 |
| Why doesn't Elizabeth <em>pack</em> the Lords? | Dec 2002 |
| Administrative and tactical organization of the RMN | Dec 2002 |
| Fission/fusion power reactors | Dec 2002 |
| Counter-missile canisters | Dec 2002 |
| Counter-missile fire control issues and counter-missile pods | Dec 2002 |
| Does the Manticoran Peerage allow Proxy Voting | Dec 2002 |
| Manticoran Peerage seating | Nov 2002 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Single-drive fusion-powered missiles
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: November 14, 2004
Is anyone going to build a single-drive missile with a fusion power plant?
Almost certainly not. A fusion plant is larger than the capacitors required to store the energy required by a single-drive missile. It's smaller than the multiple capacitors required to power the multiple drive systems of an MDM. In addition, adding the necessary hardware to kickstart the fusion plant before launch would require a substantial up-sizing of the launchers firing them. The only real argument in favor of putting a fusion plant aboard a single-drive missile would be that it would provide both the power density and the endurance required to take full advantage of the EW capabilities provided by Ghost Rider. That isn't a minor consideration, but for a ship which would be firing single-drive missiles, that's not likely to be as significant a concern. Those vessels are going to be smaller and less capable, whatever they do. If the idea is that somehow switching to a fusion-plant drive and single-drive missile would produce a smaller single-drive weapon, that wouldn't happen.
