Title | Posted |
---|---|
<em>Roland</em>-class destroyer | Oct 2004 |
Compensator failure | Oct 2004 |
The status of the Lynx System | Oct 2004 |
The Union of Monica | Oct 2004 |
Why does Mesa still exist? | Oct 2004 |
LACs towing counter-missile pods | Oct 2004 |
Strategic map as of <em>Shadow of Saganami</em> | Sep 2004 |
Variable geometry starships | Sep 2004 |
Recon LACs | Sep 2004 |
Powered missile pods | Sep 2004 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Is anyone going to build a single-drive missile with a fusion power plant?
Almost certainly not. A fusion plant is larger than the capacitors required to store the energy required by a single-drive missile. It's smaller than the multiple capacitors required to power the multiple drive systems of an MDM. In addition, adding the necessary hardware to kickstart the fusion plant before launch would require a substantial up-sizing of the launchers firing them. The only real argument in favor of putting a fusion plant aboard a single-drive missile would be that it would provide both the power density and the endurance required to take full advantage of the EW capabilities provided by Ghost Rider. That isn't a minor consideration, but for a ship which would be firing single-drive missiles, that's not likely to be as significant a concern. Those vessels are going to be smaller and less capable, whatever they do. If the idea is that somehow switching to a fusion-plant drive and single-drive missile would produce a smaller single-drive weapon, that wouldn't happen.