Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Misconceptions about Torch | Jun 2008 |
| Point defense laser clusters | Jun 2008 |
| The League vs the Star Empire of Manticore: <em>Who declares war on who?</em> | Jun 2008 |
| Status of the Solarian League Navy | Jun 2008 |
| The Cherwell Convention's Equipment Clause | May 2008 |
| White Haven's relief mission to Yeltsin | May 2008 |
| Escort CLACs | May 2008 |
| Capital ships and raiding defenses | May 2008 |
| Map of the planet Safehold (as of <em>By Schism Rent Asunder</em>) | May 2008 |
| Removing Giancola from office | Feb 2008 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
