Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| <em>Shrikes </em>and <em>Ferrets </em>are not fighters | Oct 2002 |
| Q-ships | Oct 2002 |
| Q-ships as convoy escorts/raiders | Oct 2002 |
| Grav lance | Oct 2002 |
| Missile orientation during flight | Oct 2002 |
| Missile pods: where are they tractored? | Oct 2002 |
| Missile pods as strap-on weapons? | Oct 2002 |
| Missile pod launchers | Oct 2002 |
| Missile pods: how well can you fit pods/box launchers on the exterior of a hull? | Oct 2002 |
| VLS cells for light units | Oct 2002 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
