Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Effectiveness of cruisers-vs-battlecruisers | Feb 2003 |
| <em>Wayfarer </em>and camouflaging itself as a merchantman | Feb 2003 |
| "Buckshot" missile defenses | Jan 2003 |
| Why doesn't Elizabeth <em>pack</em> the Lords? | Dec 2002 |
| Administrative and tactical organization of the RMN | Dec 2002 |
| Fission/fusion power reactors | Dec 2002 |
| Counter-missile canisters | Dec 2002 |
| Counter-missile fire control issues and counter-missile pods | Dec 2002 |
| Does the Manticoran Peerage allow Proxy Voting | Dec 2002 |
| Manticoran Peerage seating | Nov 2002 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Hardening shipkiller missile drives
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: June 10, 2005
A suggestion has been made that it would make sense to put drives into shipkiller missiles of sufficient power to make them immune to wedge kill by a counter-missile. Is this practical? Could it be done as the final stage of a MDM?
No, it isn't. And it won't be -- ever. I believe we've had this discussion before. You cannot -- not "it would be hard," not "only possible with great difficulty," but cannot -- build a missile drive sufficiently powerful to take out another missile (or counter-missile) drive without being taken out itself. End of story. The physical size constraints make it impossible. That's why counter-missiles have used their impeller wedges as their primary missile-killing weapon for so long.
