Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Order of Battle: The Siege of Earth | Nov 2004 |
| Order of Battle: First Clash - The Vanguard | Nov 2004 |
| Order of Battle: The Battle of Zeta Trianguli Australis | Nov 2004 |
| Order of Battle: Second Clash - The Main Body | Nov 2004 |
| "Paintball"-style projectile weapons training | Nov 2004 |
| The origin of the Manticoran technical edge | Nov 2004 |
| Is the destroyer obsolete as a ship type? | Nov 2004 |
| Arsenal ships based upon ammunition colliers | Nov 2004 |
| Off-bore missile targeting | Nov 2004 |
| Single-drive fusion-powered missiles | Nov 2004 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Asymmetrical broadsides
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: October 22, 2002
Why Are Starships Symmetrical? The question of why ships aren't designed with separate broadsides optimized for different types of combat -- that is, missile-range combat as opposed to energy-range combat -- has emerged once again. Do you want to comment on this one at all?
Symmetrical Broadsides. No, I don't want to comment on this. I've done it before, and the statements I made then still apply. Indeed, they've become even more relevant in an era in which broadside missile tubes are becoming less and less significant for major combatants and the need for missile defenses has never been greater. Asymmetrical broadsides would be a bad idea.
