Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| White Haven's double-transit to Basilisk | Jun 2005 |
| Shipkiller missile evasive maneuvers | Jun 2005 |
| FTL fire control | Jun 2005 |
| Fire control uplink flexibility | Dec 2004 |
| Construction time for the first-flight <em>Harringtons</em> | Dec 2004 |
| Erewhon's 'betrayal' of the Manticoran Alliance | Dec 2004 |
| Fleet strengths as of 1905 PD | Dec 2004 |
| Shipbuilding times | Dec 2004 |
| Fleet strengths as of 1920 PD | Dec 2004 |
| Effective intercept range for counter-missiles | Dec 2004 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
The Battle of Farley's Crossing
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: March 03, 2004
…Frontier Fleet does useful, essential work every single day and Battle Fleet… does not. As someone pointed out, the Battle of Farley's Crossing is referenced in IEH as the last major battle of the SLN. It happend approximately two centuries ago (a little less) and the simulation being used wasn't an SLN sim; it was a Peep sim, because the Peeps were studying the battle as a training tool and the SLN wasn't. In addition, there were 600 ships present, but less than a dozen ships of the wall. It was essentially a Frontier Fleet action, with about 160 SLN ships standing off and trashing around 3 times their number of smaller units (including some from a "rogue" system defense fleet contingent; the aforesaid Farley's Crossing System). They trashed the opposition because of superior technology, which masked the fact that their tactics sucked wind, and Battle Fleet's opinion of the battle is that if those Frontier Fleet yahoos can handle the neobarbs that handily, it just proves that no one would stand a chance against us! In other words, the SLN, institutionally, managed to learn virtually nothing from the battle.
