

Title | Posted |
---|---|
Wealth and opportunities in the Solarian League | Apr 2009 |
More on the sources of Manticoran wealth | Apr 2009 |
With Apollo, do you really need armor any more? | Apr 2009 |
The spillover effect from Manticore's Junction-created astrographic position | Apr 2009 |
Shot weight vs shot size | Apr 2009 |
Apollo fire control for light units | Apr 2009 |
Overwhelming the RMN with light units | Apr 2009 |
Why the Queen's Own exists | Apr 2009 |
Operation Ark's mission plan | Apr 2009 |
A comparative look at the BC(P) vs BC(L) | Apr 2009 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Capital missiles are more dangerous than cruiser/battlecruiser-range missiles because:
In many ways, the MSM is simply the capital missile writ large. It delivers the same terminal payload and has very similar ECM and pen aids. In addition, of course, it has additional drive units, which give it either a vastly higher acceleration or a much longer burn time (with some "restart" options standard missiles lack), which makes it much more dangerous at almost any range. It pays for this by being larger than the regular capital missile, which means that the birds will be such space hogs that it is unlikely any ship in the present-day (Echoes of Honor) size range of a BC would ever mount them.
The original RMN missile pods were designed for capital missiles. The missile pods carried by the Medusa/Harrington class SDPs were designed from the outset to handle the MSM, as were the ships' standard broadside launchers. Note that an MSM launcher can fire a smaller missile, although the smaller launchers cannot fire MSMs.