Thaliodin wrote:pokermind wrote:Using steam to propel a projectile like gun-powder forget it too high a pressure needed for a reasonable muzzle velocity. Hook a small steam engine up to a Gatling gun crank why bother make a Gardner gun and then upgrade to a maximum machine gun.
Why are all you SIFI gun-nuts fixed on the Gatling, more barrels, heavier, and cumbersome or the multirace even worse! the paths that the bolts follow are machined in a cylinder oodles of fun to machine.
So wicki the Gardner or check it out on you-tube. it uses simple easy to machine cams, and the Gardner is the direct ancestor of the maximum machine gun.
The Gatling gun has several significant advantages with cooling, mechanical reliability, and gravity-fed ammunition. The Gardner gun incorporated many of the same features, but both of them require a drawn-brass cartridge. The Gatling design would could easily be derived from a mitrailleuse-type design to provide additional firepower in the field.
Of course, a steam/belt-driven Gatling with a sufficiently large ammunition hopper would be capable of extremely high rates of fire, faster than any human could turn a crank.
Have to agree with Pokermind here. The simple truth is that if you want a heavy weapon, then a revolver-rotary is far more efficient, and for a lighter weapon a singlebarrel automatic is far better overall.
And for half the times where a so called gatling(call it a (full barrel) rotary gun as it is, Gatling wasn´t the only one to build rotaries even in his time) is better than either two i mentioned above, a Gast gun is better.
Rotaries are good when you dont care about weight efficiency and the spin-up time doesn´t matter(gatlings waste their first 0.1-0.5s worth of shots while spinning up), which is why they´re common on ships where the extra weight is minimal and targets are far enough that wasting the first 10 or so shots isnt an issue, but everyone(ehm, except one) have dropped them from aircrafts.