Theemile wrote:Jonathan_S wrote:No. Like I said, running a wedge is an energy negative action. You have to expend energy to keep the wedge going; the energy siphon effect of the wedge only covers some fraction of its power requirements. (We don't know the exact amount, but say if covered 90% of the energy usage -- the missile's onboard power would still have to provide the other 10% to keep the wedge going. So when the wedge goes down the energy the missiles on-board power supply needs to provide goes down)
Actually my speculation is that the siphon percentage is variable, but never as high as 100%. Basically that as the missile goes faster and relativity should start requiring more and more energy to maintain the same acceleration rate; but that basically all that extra energy comes from the energy siphon effect -- so the energy draw from the capacitors or reactor might remain close to constant. But that's just a personal speculation.
All we know for sure is that both wedges and sails siphon energy, and only sails (in a grav wave) are capable of siphoning enough energy to fully run themselves.
So no energy from the wedge goes to the other hardware in the missile. A capacitor missile has power stored specifically for running the sensors, ecm, and coms for a specific period of time (plus energy for the RMS system and Warhead), that we know is at least ~20 minutes of time, possibly more.
This has always gotten my goat. We've had this discussion before and I have acquiesced. But that goat still makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck. The wedge seems to be an infinite power source to be able to perform the “voodoo that it do(es).”
A wedge can drive an object (seemingly regardless of its mass) to a significant fraction of light; .9X C.
Only a wedge can destroy a wedge. Yet a wedge constantly needs energy to keep itself running. The current crop of HV missiles are powered by a reactor. This reactor keeps the wedge running. It may as well power all other nominal systems in ballistic mode as well. No need to add redundant capacitors; right?
Yet, capacity powered missiles in the earlier HV had the same capabilities as nuclear powered missiles. The only difference seem to be the enormous energy budget available to power the RMN’s superior ECM.
Back to only a wedge can destroy a wedge. A larger wedge will destroy a smaller wedge. Two wedges of the same size would result in wedge fratricide. They’ll take each other out. But what if the wedges are the same size but one wedge is powered by capacitors and the other is powered by a reactor?
Considering this question as it applies to a warship, at one point posters were submitting that a NIMM (near infinite mass missile) could NOT destroy a ship’s wedge in “ram mode”. (Near infinite mass because it is traveling near the speed of light.)*
Text has witnessed the wedge faltering but staying up. I suppose when a wedge is faltering it is drawing more power from the reactor during those moments. It seems intuitive that a wedge powered by a reactor should have more energy to contribute to the health of the wedge than one powered by a bank of capacitors. If vice versa then vice versa. Thus, wedge on wedge collisions should only result in destruction of the weaker wedge, and not necessarily the smaller wedge.
So, during the time Manticore had reactor powered missiles and Haven did not, it would seem that in a war of wedges, Haven’s missiles should not have survived.
*Near infinite mass missiles are first discussed on page 128 of the venerable ? thread.