Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests

shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthole?

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by tlb   » Tue Feb 25, 2025 9:49 am

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4763
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

ThinksMarkedly wrote:Sorry, ambiguous language here. I was referring to the population of the planet called Darius Gamma, which I assume from the name is the third rock from the sun. We've also heard about the "shipyards at Darius Prime", but whether that's the first planet or the star itself is unclear. Star Trek uses "Prime" for the first planet.

From Mission of Honor:
Chapter 38 wrote:Albrecht Detweiler reflected on exactly what that implied as he stood to one side on what would have been the flag deck aboard an actual warship and watched the enormous space station, gleaming in the reflected light of the F6 star called Darius, growing larger on the visual display as MANS Genesis approached it. The station—known officially as Darius Prime—orbited the planet Gamma, Darius' only habitable world, and at the moment, it was over Gamma's night side, just approaching the terminator. The planetary surface below it sparkled with lines and beads of light, and there were four other stations to keep it company, although none of them were remotely the same size as Manticore's Hephaestus or Vulcan.

Or the size they had been, at any rate.

His eyes moved to the ships taking form in the shipyards Darius Prime supported. Eventually, those ships would become the first units of the Leonard Detweiler class, he knew, although it wouldn't happen anywhere near as soon as he wished.
So Darius is the star, Darius Prime is one of five orbital stations and Gamma is the only inhabited planet. However it is simplest to just say "the workers at Darius" or "the population of Darius" (because there might some housed on the orbitals or out in the asteroids) and we will know that you mean the system and not the sun.

Calling the planet Gamma shows a lack of imagination. There are many better names from the rule of Darius the Great, for instance Macedonia comes to mind.

PS: Star Trek calling the first planet "Prime" is sort of silly, because that would make Mercury the prime planet (in name only). Doing that for the first planet in the Goldilocks Zone would make more sense.
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Tue Feb 25, 2025 10:09 pm

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4656
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

tlb wrote:Calling the planet Gamma shows a lack of imagination. There are many better names from the rule of Darius the Great, for instance Macedonia comes to mind.


And there are quite a few interesting names in the HV, including alphabetical ones which help remembering which one is which.

In the MBS, all the planets are named after creatures, preferably mythical ones.


PS: Star Trek calling the first planet "Prime" is sort of silly, because that would make Mercury the prime planet (in name only). Doing that for the first planet in the Goldilocks Zone would make more sense.


It's to avoid saying "one". Mercury is Sol Prime, but Venus is Sol II and Earth is Sol III.

Meanwhile, in RL, the IAU names them with lowercase letters... starting with "b".
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by tlb   » Tue Feb 25, 2025 10:32 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4763
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

tlb wrote:Star Trek calling the first planet "Prime" is sort of silly, because that would make Mercury the prime planet (in name only). Doing that for the first planet in the Goldilocks Zone would make more sense.
ThinksMarkedly wrote:It's to avoid saying "one". Mercury is Sol Prime, but Venus is Sol II and Earth is Sol III.
Then why not use the ordinals: primus, secundus, tertius, quartus, quintus, sextus, septimus, octavus, nonus, decimus and so on? Prime more closely means of first importance these days (for example Darius Prime), which the first planet (Mercury) clearly is not.
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Wed Feb 26, 2025 9:34 am

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4656
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

tlb wrote:Then why not use the ordinals: primus, secundus, tertius, quartus, quintus, sextus, septimus, octavus, nonus, decimus and so on? Prime more closely means of first importance these days (for example Darius Prime), which the first planet (Mercury) clearly is not.


So you want Star Trek script writers to be consistent and come up with that detailed nomenclature? And actors to pronounce it? Even the books which have an editor ensuring consistency aren't that consistent.

Why are habitable planets called "Class M" instead of "Class A?" Or "Class One?"
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by tlb   » Wed Feb 26, 2025 7:32 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4763
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

tlb wrote:Then why not use the ordinals: primus, secundus, tertius, quartus, quintus, sextus, septimus, octavus, nonus, decimus and so on? Prime more closely means of first importance these days (for example Darius Prime), which the first planet (Mercury) clearly is not.
ThinksMarkedly wrote:So you want Star Trek script writers to be consistent and come up with that detailed nomenclature? And actors to pronounce it? Even the books which have an editor ensuring consistency aren't that consistent.

Why are habitable planets called "Class M" instead of "Class A?" Or "Class One?"

Well I do not particularly care about the Star Trek writers, I stopped watching decades ago. I just do not like a naming system that makes an insignificant planet seem like the most important, just say first, second, third etc... to indicate position, if you do not like Latin. Anyway actors that play doctors have to pronounce things that are much more complicated.

I have no idea what habitable planets are called, nor why the nomenclature was chosen.
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by Theemile   » Thu Feb 27, 2025 9:38 am

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5363
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

tlb wrote:
tlb wrote:Then why not use the ordinals: primus, secundus, tertius, quartus, quintus, sextus, septimus, octavus, nonus, decimus and so on? Prime more closely means of first importance these days (for example Darius Prime), which the first planet (Mercury) clearly is not.
ThinksMarkedly wrote:So you want Star Trek script writers to be consistent and come up with that detailed nomenclature? And actors to pronounce it? Even the books which have an editor ensuring consistency aren't that consistent.

Why are habitable planets called "Class M" instead of "Class A?" Or "Class One?"

Well I do not particularly care about the Star Trek writers, I stopped watching decades ago. I just do not like a naming system that makes an insignificant planet seem like the most important, just say first, second, third etc... to indicate position, if you do not like Latin. Anyway actors that play doctors have to pronounce things that are much more complicated.

I have no idea what habitable planets are called, nor why the nomenclature was chosen.


I always knew that the level of technology was made up on Star Trek, but once learning the actual science as a teenager, and how much BS they manufactured for the show, was disheartened - Of course college doubled down and made Star Trek science more disheartening. I was building a PC out of spare parts for data collection and analysis for a paper I was working on while watching the premier episode of ST:Voyager, throwing frustratingly non-functional parts at the tv when they made mistakes discussing Quantum mechanics and Einsteinian physics.

The PC- I got working and it soldiered on for the next 8 years; ST:Voyager, I only watched a few handful of episodes, constantly wondering how they had any crew left, and how they kept the ship moving (and in the right direction) with a faulty understanding of early 20th century physics.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by penny   » Fri Feb 28, 2025 7:59 am

penny
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1478
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

Jonathan_S wrote:The discrepancy in the number of Haven's ships showed up a whilte ago (about 3 years back in the story) just before Thunderbolt kicked off the 2nd war.

And even then it only looks like a discrepancy if you were carefully monitoring what all their known yards were working on during the Ceasefire.

So anybody who was clued into to the likelihood of a secret yard complex would already have been looking before Galton. But even if the Grand Alliance declassifies how they found Galton (or that secret leaks) the techniques they used seem unlikely to be useful in finding Bolthole.

After all, a key clue was tracking freighters heading out from neutral territory. But Bolthole would have been set up by Peep state freighters going directly Peep territory to the wormhole and through to Calvin's Hope. You wouldn't have those 3rd party records to find because they'd have no reason to pass through 3rd party neutral territory -- and the Peeps of the time would have reasons to scrub, sanitize, or falsify what shipping records there were.

So, no, I don't think the Grand Alliance finding Galton is likely to cause Bolthole to be found any sooner.


But there is a possibility that the MAN used the knowledge of an incoming invasion to acquire the location. Some time ago I suggested some sort of a tracking device of malign design being stealthily attached to the hull of select GA ships in inconspicuous places.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Fri Feb 28, 2025 1:54 pm

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4656
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

penny wrote:But there is a possibility that the MAN used the knowledge of an incoming invasion to acquire the location. Some time ago I suggested some sort of a tracking device of malign design being stealthily attached to the hull of select GA ships in inconspicuous places.


That's what we've been discussing. There doesn't seem to be much traffic of ships going to Bolthole: ships come from it, not to it. It's not being used as a repair yard - the other, overt yards in Haven space and in the GA can take up that job. The only ships going to it are transports, which the MAlign spies would have a harder time getting to.

That's also a good reason not to have the Bolthole ferry crews go to a standard RHN station, but instead only as far as J-156-18(L). Attaching to the hull of a ship there would be quite obvious, because EVA exercises to the returning ships are likely never going to happen in that system.
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by tlb   » Fri Feb 28, 2025 2:17 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4763
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

penny wrote:But there is a possibility that the MAN used the knowledge of an incoming invasion to acquire the location. Some time ago I suggested some sort of a tracking device of malign design being stealthily attached to the hull of select GA ships in inconspicuous places.
ThinksMarkedly wrote:That's what we've been discussing. There doesn't seem to be much traffic of ships going to Bolthole: ships come from it, not to it. It's not being used as a repair yard - the other, overt yards in Haven space and in the GA can take up that job. The only ships going to it are transports, which the MAlign spies would have a harder time getting to.

That's also a good reason not to have the Bolthole ferry crews go to a standard RHN station, but instead only as far as J-156-18(L). Attaching to the hull of a ship there would be quite obvious, because EVA exercises to the returning ships are likely never going to happen in that system.

Perhaps some intermediate place, such as an uninhabited system around a dwarf star, so not even the wormhole location is given away.

Honor managed to get a bomb attached to a repair ship at Sidemore in the Marsh System without needing anyone to perform a space walk.
Top
Re: shower thought: Could the fall of galton exposed bolthol
Post by Jonathan_S   » Fri Feb 28, 2025 2:52 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9040
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

tlb wrote:Honor managed to get a bomb attached to a repair ship at Sidemore in the Marsh System without needing anyone to perform a space walk.

True - but it was deployed to the repair ship from a shuttle that was itself locked to the outer hull of said repair ship. (And the Honor's engineer presumably did have to space walk to attach it to Warnecke's shuttle; with Honor and her armsmen inside with him)

So, yes the demo charge had to be mobile enough to move itself from the shuttle to the repair ship's hull -- but that's a lot easier than sneaking up on a ship in open space to get close enough to deploy a demo charge onto it.

But even that level of mobility was simply falling down "the tractor pads holding the demolition charge to the shuttle disengaged. The device Warnecke had blithely assumed was only a demolition charge clanged to the repair ship's hull, and the amber telltale flashed confirmation as a second set of pads locked it in place." [IEH]
Top

Return to Honorverse