Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests

Spoilers - Toll of Honor

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by markusschaber   » Tue Aug 13, 2024 2:18 pm

markusschaber
Commander

Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2022 3:37 pm

penny wrote:One thing that seems to be the bull in the China shop is the almost above the law status of members of the House of Lords and Commons. It also seems to be the same with Grayson regarding the Keys. These high ranking civilian positions are instrumental to the balance of power. How can a member of either be thrown in jail for a crime when his vote is instrumental in the smooth running of the government?

****** *

On another note. I was under the impression that a lot of people attended the duels on Manticore. I don't think any extra observers were there for Tankersley's execution.

I was also under the impression that the range of each duelist from each other would be forty meters. And that that forty meters would be written in stone. But each contestant stands back to back then takes twenty paces, turns and fires. It seems that there is an assumption of one meter per pace. However, the length of individual strides are different. Someone as tall as Honor would certainly have a longer stride.

At any rate, I assumed the forty meters would be measured beforehand.


Immunity of MPs, Senators, Ministers, Presidents, and other political figures is also common in modern democratic states, see the heavliy discussed US Supreme Court decision about presidential immunity those days.

For duels, there's two different protocols, the Dreyfus Protocol and the Ellington Protocol, having different rules. As far as I remember, the Duel between Honor and Summervale was according to the "harsher" Ellington Protocol, the two others followed the Dreyfus Protocol.

Also, AFAIR, the exact rules / distances have been retconned - through "word of god" (I don't remember the exact source any more) and later in "Toll of Honor".
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Wed Aug 14, 2024 11:17 am

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4524
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

penny wrote:One thing that seems to be the bull in the China shop is the almost above the law status of members of the House of Lords and Commons. It also seems to be the same with Grayson regarding the Keys. These high ranking civilian positions are instrumental to the balance of power. How can a member of either be thrown in jail for a crime when his vote is instrumental in the smooth running of the government?


It's unknown whether those worthies have immunity from prosecution.

Though one advantage of a hereditary aristocracy is that there's a clear line of succession: if this person is removed, that next one becomes the vote. There's no legal reason not to prosecute a lord or a key because it would result in fewer votes active in parliament.

Politically it's another matter, of course.

At any rate, I assumed the forty meters would be measured beforehand.


Just stand where the blood stains are.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by tlb   » Thu Aug 15, 2024 8:17 am

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4459
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

penny wrote:One thing that seems to be the bull in the China shop is the almost above the law status of members of the House of Lords and Commons. It also seems to be the same with Grayson regarding the Keys. These high ranking civilian positions are instrumental to the balance of power. How can a member of either be thrown in jail for a crime when his vote is instrumental in the smooth running of the government?

There are too many members for one member to be "instrumental to the balance of power"; unless the ruling party is in danger of losing its majority. However the next in line for the seat might then vote in place of the displaced person.

Here is the answer to a freedom of information request addressed to the House Of Lords Information Office, House of Lords on 16 December 2008:
Thank you for your email.

Under the Forfeiture Act 1870 those convicted of treason are
disqualified from sitting or voting as a member of the House of Lords.
There is no statutory disqualification in relation to any other criminal
offence.

Members of the House of Lords who, having been convicted of a criminal
offence, are given a custodial sentence, are as a matter of course
unable to attend the House or vote for the duration of their sentence.
In such circumstances the Lord Speaker informs the House at the earliest
opportunity following commencement of the sentence. The only member of
the House of Lords who is currently serving a prison sentence is Lord
Black of Crossharbour. The Lord Speaker formally informed the House of
his sentence on 4 March 2008.
A later revision to the law permitted expulsion for serious offenses.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Thu Aug 15, 2024 11:26 am

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4524
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

tlb wrote:Here is the answer to a freedom of information request addressed to the House Of Lords Information Office, House of Lords on 16 December 2008:
Thank you for your email.

Under the Forfeiture Act 1870 those convicted of treason are
disqualified from sitting or voting as a member of the House of Lords.
There is no statutory disqualification in relation to any other criminal
offence.

Members of the House of Lords who, having been convicted of a criminal
offence, are given a custodial sentence, are as a matter of course
unable to attend the House or vote for the duration of their sentence.
In such circumstances the Lord Speaker informs the House at the earliest
opportunity following commencement of the sentence. The only member of
the House of Lords who is currently serving a prison sentence is Lord
Black of Crossharbour. The Lord Speaker formally informed the House of
his sentence on 4 March 2008.
A later revision to the law permitted expulsion for serious offenses.


Well, unable to attend is a given.

But vote? It's possible the person who was sentenced to prison time can give their vote to a proxy, if proxy-voting is allowed.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by penny   » Fri Aug 16, 2024 7:53 am

penny
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

ThinksMarkedly wrote:
penny wrote:One thing that seems to be the bull in the China shop is the almost above the law status of members of the House of Lords and Commons. It also seems to be the same with Grayson regarding the Keys. These high ranking civilian positions are instrumental to the balance of power. How can a member of either be thrown in jail for a crime when his vote is instrumental in the smooth running of the government?


It's unknown whether those worthies have immunity from prosecution.

Though one advantage of a hereditary aristocracy is that there's a clear line of succession: if this person is removed, that next one becomes the vote. There's no legal reason not to prosecute a lord or a key because it would result in fewer votes active in parliament.

Politically it's another matter, of course.

At any rate, I assumed the forty meters would be measured beforehand.


Just stand where the blood stains are.

LoL

I hope the grounds are mopped clean of past duels. That would be gross... as in grotesque.

In Honor's duel with Summervale, white circles were made marking the place for each duelist to stand. Twenty meters apart for the Ellington Protocol.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by penny   » Fri Aug 16, 2024 8:06 am

penny
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

If I had been Young, I would have sued Honor for libel. Ultimately, what else did Young have to lose at the end of the day, except his life which was already on forfeit? I would have done to Honor in the midst of my demise as Khan did to Kirk. “From hell’s gates I spit at thee.” Or something like that.

That would have placed Honor in a very bad situation by making her have to divulge where and how she came by the evidence. Evidence that was illegally obtained. Honor would have had to throw her friends under the bus. She wouldn't have done that. Even if she had, Young would have gotten the satisfaction of hurting Honor once again. And with the North Hollow Files, he probably could have gotten a very light jail sentence, compared to what he should or would have gotten without the files.

Anyway, Young would have been protected from being challenged by Honor to a duel because of the rules which said parties in a lawsuit cannot challenge each other. And there’d have been a good chance Honor would have dropped the entire thing, being faced with going to court and having to throw her friends under the bus.

At the very least, Ramirez's career would have been over. As well as, I suspect, every other officer involved in that unscheduled, impromptu, unnecessary very risky “training mission” to Gryphon. At most.


At any rate, this is something else that defies my belief. The author did a very fine job explaining how important ones honor is on Manticore. And for someone who is as loftily born as a Pavel Young, the importance of ones Honor would be extremely magnified. But I still have problems with honor being more important than ones life, at the end of the day. Oh, I can surely accept that there would be those whose mindset and mental constitution is weak enough that they'd rather die. There are those on Earth who are like that now. But, well, I would hope they are the exception to the rule when it comes to the pursuit of life and wanting to continue breathing.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by tlb   » Fri Aug 16, 2024 8:18 am

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4459
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

penny wrote:If I had been Young, I would have sued Honor for libel. Ultimately, what else did Young have to lose at the end of the day, except his life which was already on forfeit? I would have done to Honor in the midst of my demise as Khan did to Kirk. “From hell’s gates I spit at thee.” Or something like that.

That would have placed Honor in a very bad situation by making her have to divulge where and how she came by the evidence. Evidence that was illegally obtained. Honor would have had to throw her friends under the bus. She wouldn't have done that. Even if she had, Young would have gotten the satisfaction of hurting Honor once again. And with the North Hollow Files, he probably could have gotten a very light jail sentence, compared to what he should or would have gotten without the files.

Anyway, Young would have been protected from being challenged by Honor to a duel because of the rules which said parties in a lawsuit cannot challenge each other. And there’d have been a good chance Honor would have dropped the entire thing, being faced with going to court and having to throw her friends under the bus.

At the very least, Ramirez's career would have been over. As well as, I suspect, every other officer involved in that unscheduled, impromptu, unnecessary very risky “training mission” to Gryphon. At most.

But what if Honor did NOT have to divulge the source? For the purposes of a slander trial (not libel, since not written), it would be sufficient to show that Honor had reason to believe that it was true. The person that actually slandered Pavel was now dead at Honor's hand, so there was no way for him to proceed.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by penny   » Fri Aug 16, 2024 8:53 am

penny
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

I think the way the law works, one must reveal how one came by damning evidence. It must be ascertained that one didn't come into possession of said evidence illegally, and worse, by illegally committing a crime (i.e., murder, torture or both) that is worse than the evidence obtained. And to prove that one isn't in possession of key evidence because one was directly involved in the crime oneself, or that said evidence was not stolen, reproduced and planted. Or blackmail, or …

“Oh, I’m always discreet, Milord.”

“Good.” North Hollow sipped wine moodily. “To be honest, I’d really prefer to engage your courtroom services and sue her for libel. Even if the case ultimately failed, the litigation would bar her from issuing any challenges before the Navy deploys her out of the system. But I can’t risk it.”

“Actually, and I provide this information free of any charge, Milord, suing her for libel would be a very, very bad idea.”

“Oh?” North Hollow lowered his glass.

“As you’re undoubtedly aware, my client list is extensive,” she said. “Among my many clients is the Roualeyn Corporation. They own a château in the Arduus Mountains on Gryphon. A little over a month ago, Denver Summervale was a guest there, and during his stay, a Royal Navy pinnace supporting a Marine training exercise suffered a navigation systems failure and landed not far from the château. There was . . . some unpleasantness when the embarked Marines visited the château, ostensibly to seek directions.” Her eyes met North Hollow’s very levelly across the table. “While they were there, the senior officer present—a Colonel Ramirez, I believe—had a personal conversation with Mister Summervale.”

The color drained from North Hollow’s face.
“Speaking in a purely professional sense,” she continued, “and based solely on my second- or thirdhand understanding of events, I feel confident Colonel Ramirez violated quite a few of the Star Kingdom’s laws in the course of his interview with Mister Summervale. Unfortunately, for reasons I expect you can probably understand, the Roualeyn Corporation’s management—and, frankly, Mister Summervale himself—had their own reasons for avoiding any scrutiny of his actions. One must assume, however, that the Colonel obtained whatever he’d come for, given that Mister Summervale was still alive when the Marines returned to their pinnace and departed.”

“I see.”

North Hollow’s jaw clenched again, in fresh shame, as he heard the sick awareness in his own voice. So the bitch did have proof, or at least strongly suggestive evidence. Obviously, as Doisneau had just said, it had been illegally obtained, so she couldn’t provide it to the Crown without at the very least exposing her toadies to the legal consequences their actions richly deserved. But if he sued her for libel, all her defense team had to do was to play a recording of any confession Summervale might have made. As long as she declined to file legal charges against him—or Summervale’s estate, assuming he had one, declined to file charges against her—she couldn’t be legally compelled to reveal how she’d obtained it. And, as long as analysis proved it was actually Summervale’s voice, it would offer her all the legal defense against libel she would ever need, no matter how it had come into her hands.

“You may take my word for it, Milord, that the château’s owners and their other business associates are less than happy about this entire episode,” Doisneau continued. “By the same token, they have no desire to throw bad money after good by picking an open quarrel with someone who possesses the resources—and friends—Countess Harrington can command.


Playing the "coerced" confession, even under duress, still would have protected Honor from the charge of libel, but there would have been no protection for her friends.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by tlb   » Fri Aug 16, 2024 9:37 am

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4459
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

penny wrote:I think the way the law works, one must reveal how one came by damning evidence. It must be ascertained that one didn't come into possession of said evidence illegally, and worse, by illegally committing a crime (i.e., murder, torture or both) that is worse than the evidence obtained. And to prove that one isn't in possession of key evidence because one was directly involved in the crime oneself, or that said evidence was not stolen, reproduced and planted. Or blackmail, or …

“Oh, I’m always discreet, Milord.”

“Good.” North Hollow sipped wine moodily. “To be honest, I’d really prefer to engage your courtroom services and sue her for libel. Even if the case ultimately failed, the litigation would bar her from issuing any challenges before the Navy deploys her out of the system. But I can’t risk it.”

“Actually, and I provide this information free of any charge, Milord, suing her for libel would be a very, very bad idea.”

“Oh?” North Hollow lowered his glass.

“As you’re undoubtedly aware, my client list is extensive,” she said. “Among my many clients is the Roualeyn Corporation. They own a château in the Arduus Mountains on Gryphon. A little over a month ago, Denver Summervale was a guest there, and during his stay, a Royal Navy pinnace supporting a Marine training exercise suffered a navigation systems failure and landed not far from the château. There was . . . some unpleasantness when the embarked Marines visited the château, ostensibly to seek directions.” Her eyes met North Hollow’s very levelly across the table. “While they were there, the senior officer present—a Colonel Ramirez, I believe—had a personal conversation with Mister Summervale.”

The color drained from North Hollow’s face.
“Speaking in a purely professional sense,” she continued, “and based solely on my second- or thirdhand understanding of events, I feel confident Colonel Ramirez violated quite a few of the Star Kingdom’s laws in the course of his interview with Mister Summervale. Unfortunately, for reasons I expect you can probably understand, the Roualeyn Corporation’s management—and, frankly, Mister Summervale himself—had their own reasons for avoiding any scrutiny of his actions. One must assume, however, that the Colonel obtained whatever he’d come for, given that Mister Summervale was still alive when the Marines returned to their pinnace and departed.”

“I see.”

North Hollow’s jaw clenched again, in fresh shame, as he heard the sick awareness in his own voice. So the bitch did have proof, or at least strongly suggestive evidence. Obviously, as Doisneau had just said, it had been illegally obtained, so she couldn’t provide it to the Crown without at the very least exposing her toadies to the legal consequences their actions richly deserved. But if he sued her for libel, all her defense team had to do was to play a recording of any confession Summervale might have made. As long as she declined to file legal charges against him—or Summervale’s estate, assuming he had one, declined to file charges against her—she couldn’t be legally compelled to reveal how she’d obtained it. And, as long as analysis proved it was actually Summervale’s voice, it would offer her all the legal defense against libel she would ever need, no matter how it had come into her hands.

“You may take my word for it, Milord, that the château’s owners and their other business associates are less than happy about this entire episode,” Doisneau continued. “By the same token, they have no desire to throw bad money after good by picking an open quarrel with someone who possesses the resources—and friends—Countess Harrington can command.


Playing the "coerced" confession, even under duress, still would have protected Honor from the charge of libel, but there would have been no protection for her friends.

It is not clear that Honor can be forced to disclose how she got the recording, particularly if the burden of proof is on Pavel to show that it is untrue. From Field of Dishonor:
Chapter 24 wrote:No prosecutor could use it against him, given the circumstances under which it had been obtained, but private citizens weren't bound by the same constraints as the legal establishment. If he or North Hollow brought charges for slander, they'd have to prove her allegations were untrue. Under those circumstances she could damned well use it in her defense, and where it came from or how it happened to be in her possession wouldn't matter. What would matter was that she had it, and those were only the legal consequences. It didn't even consider what would happen if his other employers realized he'd talked and—
But even if Honor has to name the source to use the recording; how can it be proved to be coerced with Denver dead? Wouldn't that require self incrimination (any way that would be for another trial)? The only thing relevant to Pavel was that Denver was asked to be truthful.

I am not sure that the military people would be in much trouble, even if charges were brought over the coercion. There were no complaints filed, everything was logged and questions were only being asked of someone (now dead) who had killed multiple military personnel and planned to kill at least one more for money.
Top
Re: Spoilers - Toll of Honor
Post by penny   » Mon Aug 19, 2024 7:44 am

penny
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

penny wrote:I think the way the law works, one must reveal how one came by damning evidence. It must be ascertained that one didn't come into possession of said evidence illegally, and worse, by illegally committing a crime (i.e., murder, torture or both) that is worse than the evidence obtained. And to prove that one isn't in possession of key evidence because one was directly involved in the crime oneself, or that said evidence was not stolen, reproduced and planted. Or blackmail, or …

“Oh, I’m always discreet, Milord.”

“Good.” North Hollow sipped wine moodily. “To be honest, I’d really prefer to engage your courtroom services and sue her for libel. Even if the case ultimately failed, the litigation would bar her from issuing any challenges before the Navy deploys her out of the system. But I can’t risk it.”

“Actually, and I provide this information free of any charge, Milord, suing her for libel would be a very, very bad idea.”

“Oh?” North Hollow lowered his glass.

“As you’re undoubtedly aware, my client list is extensive,” she said. “Among my many clients is the Roualeyn Corporation. They own a château in the Arduus Mountains on Gryphon. A little over a month ago, Denver Summervale was a guest there, and during his stay, a Royal Navy pinnace supporting a Marine training exercise suffered a navigation systems failure and landed not far from the château. There was . . . some unpleasantness when the embarked Marines visited the château, ostensibly to seek directions.” Her eyes met North Hollow’s very levelly across the table. “While they were there, the senior officer present—a Colonel Ramirez, I believe—had a personal conversation with Mister Summervale.”

The color drained from North Hollow’s face.
“Speaking in a purely professional sense,” she continued, “and based solely on my second- or thirdhand understanding of events, I feel confident Colonel Ramirez violated quite a few of the Star Kingdom’s laws in the course of his interview with Mister Summervale. Unfortunately, for reasons I expect you can probably understand, the Roualeyn Corporation’s management—and, frankly, Mister Summervale himself—had their own reasons for avoiding any scrutiny of his actions. One must assume, however, that the Colonel obtained whatever he’d come for, given that Mister Summervale was still alive when the Marines returned to their pinnace and departed.”

“I see.”

North Hollow’s jaw clenched again, in fresh shame, as he heard the sick awareness in his own voice. So the bitch did have proof, or at least strongly suggestive evidence. Obviously, as Doisneau had just said, it had been illegally obtained, so she couldn’t provide it to the Crown without at the very least exposing her toadies to the legal consequences their actions richly deserved. But if he sued her for libel, all her defense team had to do was to play a recording of any confession Summervale might have made. As long as she declined to file legal charges against him—or Summervale’s estate, assuming he had one, declined to file charges against her—she couldn’t be legally compelled to reveal how she’d obtained it. And, as long as analysis proved it was actually Summervale’s voice, it would offer her all the legal defense against libel she would ever need, no matter how it had come into her hands.

“You may take my word for it, Milord, that the château’s owners and their other business associates are less than happy about this entire episode,” Doisneau continued. “By the same token, they have no desire to throw bad money after good by picking an open quarrel with someone who possesses the resources—and friends—Countess Harrington can command.


Playing the "coerced" confession, even under duress, still would have protected Honor from the charge of libel, but there would have been no protection for her friends.


tlb wrote:It is not clear that Honor can be forced to disclose how she got the recording, particularly if the burden of proof is on Pavel to show that it is untrue. From Field of Dishonor:
Chapter 24 wrote:No prosecutor could use it against him, given the circumstances under which it had been obtained, but private citizens weren't bound by the same constraints as the legal establishment. If he or North Hollow brought charges for slander, they'd have to prove her allegations were untrue. Under those circumstances she could damned well use it in her defense, and where it came from or how it happened to be in her possession wouldn't matter. What would matter was that she had it, and those were only the legal consequences. It didn't even consider what would happen if his other employers realized he'd talked and—


tlb wrote:But even if Honor has to name the source to use the recording; how can it be proved to be coerced with Denver dead? Wouldn't that require self incrimination (any way that would be for another trial)? The only thing relevant to Pavel was that Denver was asked to be truthful.


tlb wrote:I am not sure that the military people would be in much trouble, even if charges were brought over the coercion. There were no complaints filed, everything was logged and questions were only being asked of someone (now dead) who had killed multiple military personnel and planned to kill at least one more for money.


Denver Summervale was beaten to a bloody pulp. And that was before Colonel Ramirez made the statement, paraphrasing "I said I wouldn't kill you Summervale, but I didn't say I wouldn't hurt you."

So, whatever recording existed, I am sure if it is authentic, its sounds clearly shows Summervale under duress, stressed, bleeding at the mouth, scared shitless, and babbling like a cornered criminal, if the recording is undoctored. If it has been doctored then it is useless.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top

Return to Honorverse