Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by Daryl » Thu May 23, 2024 3:20 am | |
Daryl
Posts: 3562
|
Medievel scholars arguing about how many angels can fit on a pin head?
It is what RFC decides. I suspect he does check in here for inspiration. So, who knows, you may be Archangels advising the Creator? In an infinite universe, anything can and will happen, so Honor is out there. |
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by ThinksMarkedly » Thu May 23, 2024 10:28 am | |
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4512
|
That's why they're difficult! The emergence lane is a few thousand km long and a thousand km wide or so. Given that the sails are 200 km wide, yeah, it makes for very packed ship deployments. They could be just lined up single file and you could fit them, though.
Unknown. They are generated by the nodes, so possibly yes. But they've never been described as a band of stressed gravity, and we know that acceleration cuts when a node ring switches to sails, so possibly not. Adrienne Warshawski wasn't working with Joe Buckley, who did come up with the impeller drive. Though she was also working 30 years after him, so she may have improved upon his creation.
The fact that sails are needed for grav waves and for wormhole transits would indicate they are similar phenomena. Though the wormhole itself may not be the thing that needs the sails, but the entry and emergence lanes themselves. |
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Thu May 23, 2024 10:47 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8791
|
I guess we don't know if technically you need sails during that unmeasurable instant of actually wormhole transit -- but it's kind of a moot question since you need them to survive the thousands of kilometers long (varies by wormhole) approach and departure from the termini. Sails are described as "stress bands", and a "circular disk of focused gravitation" [OBS] And they stretch out further than wedges do. OBS describes the light cruiser Fearless's sail as extending "for over three hundred kilometers in every direction from the cruiser's hull" -- but a ship that small probably has less than 150 km wide wedge - so less than 75 km measured from its center point, over the hull. (Even a much larger Reliant-class BC only has 162km wide wedge; per the diagram in Jaynes) Don't know why you would have thought a wormhole had nothing to do with hyperspace when both require the use of a hyper generator. Also, the first introduction we got to them, back in OBS, described it as "the Junction was simply a focused funnel of hyper-space, like the eye of a hurricane frozen forever in normal-space terms" But, again, the sails are needed to simply to survive in the approach/departure lanes, where you get grav turbulence analogous that that found in a grav-wave. The total area you need sails around the Junction (with its separate lanes for each remote terminus) is probably 25-50,000 km wide. Narrow enough for a laserhead to detonate outside it and its beams to still reach the center; but pretty wide in navigational terms. However the spot you have to hit to make transit is going to be significantly smaller (but I don't think we've been told quite how small) -- and the 'marked' navigational channels probably still narrower than that -- to ensure that the volume you can transit through it divided into well separated departure and arrival areas. Wouldn't want an unexpected arrival to be on a collision course with a departing starship -- and artificially splitting the volume into separate arrival and departure lanes provides that traffic separation. But I'd assume for a mass transit the niceties of normal navigation lanes are ignored, and every cubic cm of the terminus volume is utilized. However, there's plenty RFC hasn't shared about the exact mechanics of a simultaneous transit -- so we don't know exactly how the 20ish ships position themselves for it. But I'd expect that in addition to the stated mass limit there's also a volume limit. While the Junction can support a max transit of about 200 million tons (about 20 SDs), I don't think that means it could support a transit of 1,500 Wolfhound DDs (despite the later massing less) There just wouldn't be room to fit them all. (An issue you run into with shipping; heavy things can hit the max weight while there's lots of free room in the vessel while light things run out of room long before reaching max weight) |
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by penny » Sat May 25, 2024 8:26 am | |
penny
Posts: 1200
|
You misunderstood me. Or quite possibly as always, there is so much matter in my head that I failed to make my thoughts clear. I didn't mean to disparage whatever the author's intent for wormholes is. I simply failed to digest his concept because my own baggage about wormholes cannot be ignored. Einstein-Rosen bridges should not need sails, and certainly should not need a hyper generator. And the theoretical construct of an Einstein-Rosen bridge is simply space-time folded over like the old sheet of paper bringing two points in space very close together. The gravity simply sucks the ship in if it gets too close; thus negating the need for a hyper generator to enter. Wormholes have been alleged to be black holes with slightly different mechanics so some have coined them as white holes. But it all happens in n-space (albeit folded and stretched n-space) but there is no hyper space involved. Even the suction IMO is logical. If one folds an object, that object has a tendency to want to snap back. Same as a wormhole. A wormhole has an expected rubber band effect that is orchestrated by its suction (gravity). It is like cocking a gun and storing potential energy. Or winding a rubber band. Stretching or folding space-time stores potential energy. Admittedly I never paid any attention to the author's rendition of wormholes. Obviously his are not Einsteinian. Of course his have immense gravity near the entrance. After all, it is a black hole, or white hole. The author's wormholes have been subjugated and tainted by the power of plot. https://www.space.com/20881-wormholes.h ... 20universe. .
. . The artist formerly known as cthia. Now I can talk in the third person. |
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by ThinksMarkedly » Sat May 25, 2024 12:49 pm | |
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4512
|
The wormholes are not described as Einstein-Rosen Bridges. They could be some other phenomenon and that ERBs aren't practical or real. Even if they are ERBs, then what Jonathan said could still apply: there's no physically known way to approach an Einstein Rosen Bridge because the gravity gradient is too steep. It's the same frame dragging problem we discussed earlier. The ship would be indeed sucked in... after being broken apart by tidal stress and spaghettified. As for the hypergenerator, it might be necessary to transverse a bridge that is physically too small for the ship to go through, so you just skip over it and appear on the other side. Maybe even also skipping the steepest gradient of the wormhole entry.
Current physical understanding is that black hole and white holes are actually the same thing. Don't ask me to explain. Besides, moot point: even if they are such, then the entry of a wormhole would be a black hole and you'd suffer spaghettification unless the mass of said wormhole was so big that you could indeed approach it. But then it wouldn't be 7 light-hours from an inhabited system. And they'd be uni-directional. So they can't be our current understanding.
They could be the effects of primordial black holes, which is the only known way to create a BH with a sub-stellar mass. If so, they're also so small that a ship couldn't go through -- an atom couldn't go through! A 600-billion tonne PBH would have a Schwarzschild radius of just under 1 pm. |
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by C. O. Thompson » Sun Jun 09, 2024 1:11 pm | |
C. O. Thompson
Posts: 700
|
My question is sparked by the fact that Honor always mad a big deal about the precision of re-rigging sails for wormhole transition and I only recall Hyper-foot prints when a ship crossed the Alpha band
There is some text evidence that the sidewalls would not be effective to stop attack till the sails were reconfigured. It seems to me that any population in Linx would not have seen the Harvest Joy enter if they didn't happen to be looking right at it. You point to much of what I thought but I didn't get an email that there was any response to my post.
Just my 2 ₡ worth
|
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by tlb » Sun Jun 09, 2024 2:25 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4437
|
That is certainly true of Lynx, but due to the fact that there were no inhabited planets close to the end of the wormhole. From War of Honor: Four light years is far beyond the detection range of any gravitic sensor net, if Lynx could afford to have one. But once the forts are installed at the wormhole, all arrivals will be noticed. |
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by C. O. Thompson » Sun Jun 09, 2024 3:21 pm | |
C. O. Thompson
Posts: 700
|
In my research I read the scene where the Hexapuma with Helen Zilwicki is in line to transit to Lynx and a freighter suddenly appeared. There is mention of the sail being visible disks but I haven't found the "Hyper foot-print" is part of it. Now that I ma thinking about it,
The scene where the Peeps have some ships trying to see what was coming through the junction from Trevor's Star while Lester was killing home fleet. There was some discussion of not knowing what was coming through because the Lacs were able block that view with the wedges of the lacs at it.
Just my 2 ₡ worth
|
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by tlb » Sun Jun 09, 2024 4:20 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4437
|
Sorry, you were talking about the Battle of Manticore (in At All Costs?), but this is the same sort of situation with jamming by the forts in Echoes of Honor: I suppose there might not be a transition signal (because the ship might not be moving through the Alpha wall, since the wormhole could have already torn a hole through it), but unless the author tells us specifically we will not know. Nevertheless we know that the wedge, and so by extension the sail, does create a signal just by existing; therefore when a ship with sails pops into existence, that has to generate a signal that can be detected (even though it is not what is known as a "Hyper foot-print"). |
Top |
Re: Warshawski sail | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Sun Jun 09, 2024 4:44 pm | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8791
|
Yep, at least with the kind of sidewall generators that warships mount.
Now we do have a bit of an open question here on the forum about whether a "buckler" bow wall requires a wedge to function -- since, unlike the full bow wall, it doesn't actually tie into the wedge. (In fact is has several dozens of km gap between the edge of the bucker and the closest point on the wedge -- and that's for a stern wall; the gap is about 3x larger for a bow wall!) And while SVW it discussing sails in the context of grav wave combat; it is equally true that they deprive a ship that just arrived via wormhole of wedge and sidewalls. The ship has to accelerate down the arrival 'lane' until it clears the grav turbulence around the terminus before it can fold its sails down into a wedge and bring up its sidewall. |
Top |