Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests
Any insights? | |
---|---|
by JoseWilson » Sat Sep 16, 2023 7:47 am | |
JoseWilson
Posts: 1
|
As I was revisiting "Storm from the Shadows," I encountered this passage: "Artemis' combat information center had analyzed the (slowly) arriving sublight transmissions from the recon probes." I previously believed that radio waves and, of course, "whisker beams," traveled at the speed of light. Do you have any insights on this matter?
|
Top |
Re: Any insights? | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:19 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8791
|
Doing a search, while 99% of the time David Weber used that word it was in relation to ships, LACs, shuttles, or missiles there were two other spots it was used in reference to communication. "Time of response to our sublight challenge, Harper?" Honor asked her com officer. [War of Honor] And she was continuing to transmit her sublight challenges and demands that he identify himself as she came. [War of Honor] However I believe is all three cases it was used as a sloppy shorthand for "non-FTL communication" from a navy that had become used to grav-based FTL communication links; rather than some kind of actually slower than laser, or slower than radio, signal. |
Top |
Re: Any insights? | |
---|---|
by kzt » Mon Sep 18, 2023 2:57 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
Recon drones typically use FTL comms, but they have alternatives.
I have no idea why David wrote it that way (maybe he should let Baen edit him?) but I think he is saying light speed comms. |
Top |
Re: Any insights? | |
---|---|
by Theemile » Mon Sep 18, 2023 3:15 pm | |
Theemile
Posts: 5241
|
We could be pedantic - even light does not move at c in 99% of observable conditions - Since light speed (c) is defined as the speed of light in a vacuum (ie, with ZERO particle interactions) and even the interstellar medium is not a perfect vacuum, Light will always be observed to move Slightly slower than the definition of "The Speed of Light" (c). So TECHNICALLY, Sub-Light is correct terminology. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: Any insights? | |
---|---|
by Daryl » Tue Sep 19, 2023 3:43 am | |
Daryl
Posts: 3562
|
Fully agree. We can become too "trainspotterish" about fine details.
Sublight obviously means not FTL" in the author's fictional story.
|
Top |
Re: Any insights? | |
---|---|
by ThinksMarkedly » Wed Sep 20, 2023 1:25 am | |
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4512
|
Plus, transceivers introduce non-zero delays because computers (even molycirc ones) aren't instantaneous. But it seems that "sublight" is used in the Honorverse novels to mean "light-speed". |
Top |
Re: Any insights? | |
---|---|
by Joat42 » Wed Sep 20, 2023 2:05 pm | |
Joat42
Posts: 2162
|
I think its just a brainfart, don't read too much into it. Ships moving in hyper are traveling FTL but are considered sublight in normal space - rfc mistakenly carried that thinking over to communications in this instance since everywhere else it is referred to as lightspeed comms. --- Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer. Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool. |
Top |
Re: Any insights? | |
---|---|
by ThinksMarkedly » Thu Sep 21, 2023 10:47 pm | |
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4512
|
You can always just explain it away by saying that the characters use physically-erroneous expressions, but RFC knew all along. |
Top |