Theemile wrote:The big question is when was this statement made - remember, the RoH lost 50% of it's systems from the height of the PRH. And most of the lost growth was the systems towards (and past) Trevor's star that had recently been captured by the PRH, with systems like Seaford 9 (and probably Barnet) abandoned because they only had military value, with the only population supporting the military facilities.
If this statement was originally made at the height of the PRH, the Calvin wormhole could be just outside the central 1/3rd of the RHN. not centralized, but not on the outskirts either.
I agree with you the most likely loss in the RoH were prosperous systems. The most likely source of that would be wealthy and strong neighbours, especially those with wormholes. That is, those closer to Manticore and Erewhon.
I do think the PRH would have grown before and after the discovery of this wormhole out in the other direction, like La Martine. Those systems were probably very poorly defended, so they probably got absorbed into the PRH by simply having strong words. That those additions may have been a net negative to the Peep economy may not have played a role if the militants in the Legislaturalist Government insisted. And those systems are also likely not to have left the Republic afterwards: they wouldn't have been too oppressed and the economic turnaround starting with Pierre's reforms and continuing with Pritchart.
But we don't know for sure.
Anyway, yes, the Calvin Wormhole might be now closer to a greater proportion of the systems in the RoH. And yet I think that's a distinction without a difference. Haven itself is probably the single largest contributor and the oldest daughter colonies the next in line.