Pardon my bold.tlb wrote:ThinksMarkedly wrote:That depends on how far from attack that bowshock is detected. Even a peace time Navy can go to battlestations and raise interposing wedges (if they're on standby) in a few minutes.
BTW, attacking the MBS reminds me to compare the performance of the Oyster Bay weapons to the Hastas at Galton: in one of those, no bowshocks were detected. So either they were at such lower speeds that their bowshocks weren't detectable or the technology was meaningfully different to permit that. I think it's the former: the torpedoes and missile pods were sufficiently slowed to not show up in sensors.
But if it is the latter, then it's yet another point where Galton didn't have the technology that was used to attack the MBS and Grayson.cthia wrote:That is not what I meant. I am positing that during peacetime only passive scans are being carried out. I don't think passive scans will detect a bowshock at all. I am talking about Oyster-Bay-like results.
Why would you posit that? A bow-shock is energetic, so can be seen in both optical and radio wavelengths. That is what drew attention at Galton; if it had been an active scan, then the bow-shock was not necessary to the discovery.
Anyway, I expect active scans ARE done in peacetime to protect against large meteorites or debris hitting stations or planets.
I beg your pardon? Are you implying that the MA's stealth is useless in the glare of floodlights? Active scans will definitely detect an LD or stealthy missiles even w/o a bowshock?