Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests

?

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: ?
Post by cthia   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 1:54 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Loren Pechtel wrote:
cthia wrote:But that dependence might be a result of not being able to reach viable ramming speeds. And those speeds, the god of the HV has decreed, apparently begins at ~ .9C.

You don't need that sort of velocity to ram--you just need a way past the wedge. The logic behind the laserhead made sense in the SDM era, but the MDM changed things--it is almost as survivable ramming as it is at maximum standoff. Sure, it's a sitting duck for the point defenses, but the point defenses will be reloading during that last .2 seconds.

You still need standoff to get around wedges and you might need to use some standoff to avoid fratricide if too many missiles make it through (but I think this unlikely, if they are even tens of microseconds apart there will be no fratricide), but the desired attack should always be ram.

Jonathan"S wrote:Well also a way through the sidewall. I don't know what, if any, velocity would let a missile pierce that. But we know that in HotQ a pair of 78-ton impacts at 0.25c on a BC's sidewall were harmless.

But I also thing you're overstating their resistance to point defense. Even if an MDM was traveling infinitely close to the speed of light it'd still take it 11.7 seconds to cover the 3.5 million km envelope of a Mk31 CM. Sure at that speed it'd take about 0.333s to cover the PDLC envelope. And yes, the current cycle rate on an point defense laser emitters is 16 seconds; but a Nike-class BC(L) carries 30*14=420 such emitters on each flank, allowing it to keeps up a steady 25 shots/second; meaning it could get off at least 7 shots at a MDM closing at lightspeed - so not all the emitters are going to be recharging during that 1/3rd of a second it takes for light to streak through the PDLC envelope. (And of course capital ships mount even more clusters)

But, more importantly to my mind, at even normal MDM terminal velocity the missile has no ability to turn a corners. And while there may be some velocity at which a missile can blow through a sidewall, there's no evidence the same would every be true of a wedge. So all the ship would need to do to be utterly invulnerable to missile ramming attacks; not matter how high velocity they were, was roll just far enough that the wedge is interposed between the missile and the hull.

At that point you're back to have to make a 'snap shot' with a laserhead because there's no ramming target left.


And trying to reach those speeds with a drone drive is going to be a long slow process; as even in flat out, non-stealthy, mode like we saw at Mobius they've got less than 1/2 the acceleration of the low accel setting of a missile. Try to keep the accel low enough that you can hide the acceleration from just distant grav sensors and it's a quarter of that (or about 11% of the missile's low accel). So for a semi-stealthy accel you're looking at an hour and 21 minutes, covering over half a billion km (~32 lightminutes) to get to just the 0.8c an MDM can hit in 9 minutes. And at that velocity the bow shock is going to be really noticeable when it flies by your distant FTL-comm equipped picket. So even with a stealthy drive it's not sneaking up on a first line target at that velocity. (And against a 2nd or 3rd rate opponent you don't need to do anything fancy, your laserheads will rip them apart anyway)

cthia wrote:Come on guys! We have got to get on the same page here. The wedge will be screwed. The sidewalls will be screwed. If either of them is hit by a missile traveling at C, it will be screwed. Let's assume C so we will get a better idea of the worst of what we face. I agree with Loren here, about considering a missile traveling faster than a mere .9C. Anyway, a missile traveling at C has infinite mass. Why don't we just call it what it is.

This is an infinite mass projectile :!:

Now I don't know what the MilSpec rating says about wedges and sidewalls. But they are about to get tested. And they will be found lacking.

It reminds me of the episode of Knight Rider when Kitt meets Goliath. What was it? ...

-> What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?

Ans. The imposter will be revealed.



P.S. I hope all of you are right that these things would be short lived, because you wouldn't want them to ever become flying Dutchman or broken arrows.

And... once the wedge or sidewalls fall, and they will fall, I will assume that the entirety of everything on the inside of the wedge (including the ship) is in total "vacuum"). The kinetic energy will totally consume the vacuum. Consider what an explosion from inside of an object will do to that object. The precise location of the ship inside the wedge won't matter.

.
Last edited by cthia on Thu Oct 20, 2022 1:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: ?
Post by Jonathan_S   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 1:58 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9030
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Dauntless wrote:been a while but doesn't one of the the FTL drives (ennach?), in RFC's Dahck/Fourth Imperium/empire novels? the one with moon sized starships, use black holes?

I seem to recall something about artificial black holes merged from different angles to force the ship out of normal space time and this somehow gives FTL travel ability.

That does sound similar to the non-wormhole FTL drive in the 5th Imperium Dahak universe -- but I think it used focused gravity; not black holes.

Edit: took a bit to find my copy but that was called the Enchanach drive; and the description does say both gravity fields and black holes; though it uses scare quote or says "essentially" when speaking of them; still I'd forgotten that it used that term at all.

Empire from the Ashes wrote:You man envision it as the creation of converging artificially generated 'black hole,' which force the vessel out of phase with normal space in a series of instantaneous transpositions between coordinates in normal space. Under Enchanach Drive, dwell time in normal space between transpositions is approximately point-seven-five Terran femtoseconds.


Empire from the Ashes wrote:Which employed massive gravity fields -- essentially converging black holes - to literally squeeze a ship out of "real" space in a series of instantaneous transitions
Last edited by Jonathan_S on Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Re: ?
Post by cthia   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:01 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:
Dauntless wrote:been a while but doesn't one of the the FTL drives (ennach?), in RFC's Dahck/Fourth Imperium/empire novels? the one with moon sized starships, use black holes?

I seem to recall something about artificial black holes merged from different angles to force the ship out of normal space time and this somehow gives FTL travel ability.

That does sound similar to the non-wormhole FTL drive in the 5th Imperium Dahak universe -- but I think it used focused gravity; not black holes

Black holes are focused gravity.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: ?
Post by tlb   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:14 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4744
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

Dauntless wrote:been a while but doesn't one of the the FTL drives (ennach?), in RFC's Dahck/Fourth Imperium/empire novels? the one with moon sized starships, use black holes?

I seem to recall something about artificial black holes merged from different angles to force the ship out of normal space time and this somehow gives FTL travel ability.

Jonathan_S wrote:That does sound similar to the non-wormhole FTL drive in the 5th Imperium Dahak universe -- but I think it used focused gravity; not black holes

cthia wrote:Black holes are focused gravity.

That does not sound right; black holes have gravity so concentrated that light cannot escape. Focused gravity can bend light, but need not trap it. So black holes are a very special case of focused gravity, at best.
Top
Re: ?
Post by Jonathan_S   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:17 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9030
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

cthia wrote:
Dauntless wrote:been a while but doesn't one of the the FTL drives (ennach?), in RFC's Dahck/Fourth Imperium/empire novels? the one with moon sized starships, use black holes?

I seem to recall something about artificial black holes merged from different angles to force the ship out of normal space time and this somehow gives FTL travel ability.
Jonathan_S wrote:That does sound similar to the non-wormhole FTL drive in the 5th Imperium Dahak universe -- but I think it used focused gravity; not black holes

Black holes are focused gravity.

But not all focused gravity is black holes.

That said, if you see my edit I did find my ebook of the series' anthology and typed out the description; which does at least use the term black hole as an analogy for what the drive is doing.
Top
Re: ?
Post by Jonathan_S   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:24 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9030
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

cthia wrote:And... once the wedge or sidewalls fall, and they will fall, I will assume that the entirety of everything on the inside of the wedge (including the ship) is in total "vacuum"). The kinetic energy will totally consume the vacuum. Consider what an explosion from inside of an object will do to that object. The precise location of the ship inside the wedge won't matter.

.

Why would you assume the sidewalls blowing out would totally consume the ship? That certainly doesn't happen when they're burned out by any other means. (Some very localized damage where the overloaded sidewall generator blows out; but that's about it unless the weapon carries on to directly strike the hull)

But for a wedge failing we've go really nothing to go on. We know that when two wedges of comparable power connect that does result in mutual destruction of both objects. But we've no data on what might happen if a wedge was overloaded to the point of failure -- because that's never happened. They're described as impenetrable. And we've seen a little tug ram it's wedge into a multi-km section of station debris and vaporize it with scarcely a shudder imparted to the little ship. So if it's even possible to overwhelm a wedge other than by hitting it with another wedge of comparable or greater power we've no idea whether or not that failure would act like a wedge-wedge interaction or like a sidewall failing, or like something else entirely.

That's all up to RFC. (And since he seems firmly opposed to things moving faster that 0.9c in Honorverse normal space I doubt we'll ever see such a thing in those stories -- so we'll never know)
Top
Re: ?
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 2:30 pm

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4645
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

cthia wrote:Come on guys! We have got to get on the same page here. The wedge will be screwed. The sidewalls will be screwed. If either of them is hit by a missile traveling at C, it will be screwed. Let's assume C so we will get a better idea of the worst of what we face. I agree with Loren here, about considering a missile traveling faster than a mere .9C. Anyway, a missile traveling at C has infinite mass. Why don't we just call it what it is.

This is an infinite mass projectile :!:


Which is why we can't accept this. In the HV, nothing that has mass can travel at light speed. Wedges don't change that. Therefore, the speed is below C and therefore the mass isn't infinite either.

Moreover, the HV has a particle problem, so achieving high relative speeds to the interplanetary medium are definitely disallowed. Technologically there may be solutions to get to 0.9c, 0.95c or 0.99c, with different levels of difficulty and size of the vehicle.

That doesn't remove the bowshock problem and I maintain that there's no sense in developing this to work against a target without FTL comms.
Top
Re: ?
Post by Joat42   » Thu Oct 20, 2022 4:28 pm

Joat42
Admiral

Posts: 2164
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:01 am
Location: Sweden

cthia wrote:And... once the wedge or sidewalls fall, and they will fall, I will assume that the entirety of everything on the inside of the wedge (including the ship) is in total "vacuum"). The kinetic energy will totally consume the vacuum. Consider what an explosion from inside of an object will do to that object. The precise location of the ship inside the wedge won't matter.

.

A sidewall is a gravitational stress-band, not a physical object that can be hit. Anything that intersects with the stress band is ripped apart to its constituent particles and accelerated away along the stress-band so there will be no explosion from a kinetic energy conversion.

An object traveling at relativistic speeds that hits a wedge or sidewall will overload a ship's system (nodes, generators etc) to the point of failure though, and at that point some parts of the object may survive long enough to pass through the stress-band but deflected in a direction determined by the bands orientation.

---
Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer.


Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool.
Top
Re: ?
Post by cthia   » Fri Oct 21, 2022 6:25 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

ThinksMarkedly wrote:
cthia wrote:Come on guys! We have got to get on the same page here. The wedge will be screwed. The sidewalls will be screwed. If either of them is hit by a missile traveling at C, it will be screwed. Let's assume C so we will get a better idea of the worst of what we face. I agree with Loren here, about considering a missile traveling faster than a mere .9C. Anyway, a missile traveling at C has infinite mass. Why don't we just call it what it is.

This is an infinite mass projectile :!:


Which is why we can't accept this. In the HV, nothing that has mass can travel at light speed. Wedges don't change that. Therefore, the speed is below C and therefore the mass isn't infinite either.

Moreover, the HV has a particle problem, so achieving high relative speeds to the interplanetary medium are definitely disallowed. Technologically there may be solutions to get to 0.9c, 0.95c or 0.99c, with different levels of difficulty and size of the vehicle.

That doesn't remove the bowshock problem and I maintain that there's no sense in developing this to work against a target without FTL comms.

Well, there is a loophole. Mass might be able to exceed the speed of light inside a very thick/dense medium. Intense gravitational fields substitute just fine for a medium. At speeds greater than C inside a very dense medium, I can even imagine obtaining Einstein's imaginary mass. See my link upstream to read more about the loophole. But if the speed of light drops below its usually speedy C, theoretically, then something can travel faster than light, which could then be C. Theoretically. This is certainly a very involved discussion for another day.

But a missile would not need to reach C. Infinite mass is not needed to destroy the wedge or sidewalls. It is the infinitesimals that become fatal at speeds approaching C.

Upstream I misquoted what I meant to say. The mathematics become hinky from .99C to C. The infinite number of infinitesimals create exponential kinetic energy. What percentage of infinite mass do you think would be needed to destroy the wedge.

0.99? 0.999? The infinitesimals would obliterate the wedge so quickly as if it wasn't there. IMO. Think of a balloon that is instantly pierced and the kinetic energy instantly injected inside destroying the balloon before it explodes.

An aside:
In the Star Trek universe, one author does a very fine job of respecting the theoretical aspects of travel at the speed of light. In Peter David's Vendetta an intelligent race of beings create a space ship with all of their capability. It is actually the Planet Killer faced by the Enterprise in another episode. Anyway, Delcara has to get the ship up to light speed to reach the Borg.

We have assumed the particle problem has been solved or the point is moot.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: ?
Post by cthia   » Fri Oct 21, 2022 6:45 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:
cthia wrote:And... once the wedge or sidewalls fall, and they will fall, I will assume that the entirety of everything on the inside of the wedge (including the ship) is in total "vacuum"). The kinetic energy will totally consume the vacuum. Consider what an explosion from inside of an object will do to that object. The precise location of the ship inside the wedge won't matter.

.

Why would you assume the sidewalls blowing out would totally consume the ship? That certainly doesn't happen when they're burned out by any other means. (Some very localized damage where the overloaded sidewall generator blows out; but that's about it unless the weapon carries on to directly strike the hull)

But for a wedge failing we've go really nothing to go on. We know that when two wedges of comparable power connect that does result in mutual destruction of both objects. But we've no data on what might happen if a wedge was overloaded to the point of failure -- because that's never happened. They're described as impenetrable. And we've seen a little tug ram it's wedge into a multi-km section of station debris and vaporize it with scarcely a shudder imparted to the little ship. So if it's even possible to overwhelm a wedge other than by hitting it with another wedge of comparable or greater power we've no idea whether or not that failure would act like a wedge-wedge interaction or like a sidewall failing, or like something else entirely.

That's all up to RFC. (And since he seems firmly opposed to things moving faster that 0.9c in Honorverse normal space I doubt we'll ever see such a thing in those stories -- so we'll never know)

You misunderstood me. It isn't the failure of the sidewalls that would totally consume the ship. It is the instantaneous transfer of the exponential kinetic energy of the infinitesimals that would utterly consume the vacuum of the area contained within the wedge and sidewalls.

It would be like opening a mailbox, throwing in a cherry bomb and closing the door. The kinetic energy would be transferred instantly. And I am betting before the vacuum subsides. Result, the entire containment inside the wedge would go boom. Ship and all.

Is RFC really opposed to travel > .9C or is he simply saving the "nitrous oxide" for the end of the race? :D



BEWARE DOUBLE POST


.
Last edited by cthia on Fri Oct 21, 2022 7:03 am, edited 2 times in total.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top

Return to Honorverse