Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by Loren Pechtel » Sat Oct 08, 2022 11:19 am | |
Loren Pechtel
Posts: 1324
|
I don't believe you can apply ordinary physics to the passage of a Honorverse KEW through the atmosphere. The problem is the wedge. Applying normal physics produces an awful lot of energy release in the upper atmosphere and nowhere near as much boom on the ground. They're wedge-driven, though, so I think they're penetrating the atmosphere without substantial energy loss, the energy shows up when they hit the ground.
As for new elements--no. We've already mapped out everything that's stable. There might be an island of relative stability but there's nothing stable in it. Instead of looking at supernovas, look at the real synthesizers of the truly heavy elements: neutron stars. The very surface is normal matter, as you go down the pressure builds to electron degeneracy levels--you've got a layer of atomic nuclei packed together. Going still deeper you have neutron degeneracy--what the stars are named for. Note what you have at that boundary, though--tightly packed atomic nucleii encountering a veritable storm of neutrons. You will have an insane amount of r-process neutron captures. Some of the results undergo beta decay and thus take a step up the periodic table. Some undergo alpha decay and take two steps down and some fission, a few will undergo alpha capture and take two steps up. Basically anything that can be created will be created. Some of this material gets ripped off in neutron star mergers. If anything stable is created we would have already found it. |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by Joat42 » Sat Oct 08, 2022 7:46 pm | |
Joat42
Posts: 2162
|
KEW's don't use wedges, they are launched using mass-drivers. I don't remember if this has been explicitly explained in the books, but it can be inferred from textev:
In regards to the physics for KEW's, the energy-loss for traveling through atmosphere isn't really a concern since the KEW's are dart-formed and the travel through the atmosphere creates a plasma-sheath around them that significantly reduces drag which I assume you didn't take into account when calculating any energy-release attributed to atmospheric interactions. Edit: I just remembered, Manticore have the Damocles weapon system which is launched through the CMS. It is package containing several KEW's that have impellers, the impellers are used to accelerate it (to get an estimated yield) and guide the KEW to it's final trajectory and it was this weapon system that was used in Shadow of Freedom, Chapter 31 to take out the Lombroso Tower. So, errare humanum est.. So there seems to exist different flavor of KEW's, some have impellers, some have not. Regardless if they have them or not, they don't loose much energy in the atmosphere for the reason I described above. Last edited by Joat42 on Sat Oct 08, 2022 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
--- Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer. Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool. |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by tlb » Sat Oct 08, 2022 7:51 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4437
|
I found the description of the Honorverse KEW in chapter 31 of Shadow of Freedom: Note that the weight is considerable more than the five kilogram figure that people were suggesting. I take the "short-lived" comment to mean that the wedge is down by the time of atmospheric entry. Thirty times the speed of sound is close to the tenth of a percent of light speed. |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by Loren Pechtel » Sat Oct 08, 2022 10:25 pm | |
Loren Pechtel
Posts: 1324
|
Math check! I think you're mixing up meters and kilometers. |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by Robert_A_Woodward » Sun Oct 09, 2022 1:33 am | |
Robert_A_Woodward
Posts: 578
|
I believe you made an error somewhere, I calculate that .001c is 87.5 times the speed of sound (at sea level at a standard temperature). ----------------------------
Beowulf was bad. (first sentence of Chapter VI of _Space Viking_ by H. Beam Piper) |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by tlb » Sun Oct 09, 2022 8:45 am | |
tlb
Posts: 4437
|
I used Google, which gave the answer: (or 10.29 km/s) and compared that the opening post: Which gives only a factor of 3 difference (not the factor of 1000 that Loren Pechtel claims). Which part is in error? Note that in this example the velocity was dialed back. |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by ThinksMarkedly » Sun Oct 09, 2022 12:10 pm | |
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4512
|
I think Loren made the same mistake that I made when I read the post. You wrote:
My first read of that skipped the "percent" and my brain interpreted as "tenth of speed of light." That threw up alarm bells inside my head, "whoa, that's way off." That's still off by an order and a half of magnitude, though. A tenth of a percent, or one one-thousandth, of the speed of light is 300 km/s, not the 30 that Robert said. Thirty times the speed of sound, as you've just confirmed with Google, it's 10.29 km/s, or nearly 30 times less. The impactor hit at 300 km/s, which is 874x the speed of sound. At that speed, it would go through the entire atmosphere in less than one second, one third if we consider "the atmosphere" the Kármán line at 100 km, and the stratosphere and troposphere on Earth in less than a fifth of a second. In this regime, I have no clue whether it's so short that it wouldn't have noticeably slowed down from the speed in space or the other extreme that it's so fast that the atmosphere would not be meaningfully distinguishable from concrete and rock! |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by Loren Pechtel » Sun Oct 09, 2022 9:50 pm | |
Loren Pechtel
Posts: 1324
|
I didn't try to work out the math, just saw it was way off. |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by Robert_A_Woodward » Mon Oct 10, 2022 1:36 am | |
Robert_A_Woodward
Posts: 578
|
It is David Weber who claimed that the impactor hit at both 30 km/second and 1/10 of 1% of the speed of light. I will admit that I didn't notice the 1 order of magnitude error (all my calculations were based on 30KM/sec). ----------------------------
Beowulf was bad. (first sentence of Chapter VI of _Space Viking_ by H. Beam Piper) |
Top |
Re: A Side Affect of Planetary Bombardment | |
---|---|
by cthia » Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:27 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
True, not new. But the equation is the same if significant access to this element does not exist. It would be no different from third world countries having no access to uranium trying to build nuclear weapons. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |