tlb wrote:cthia wrote:In fact, if I am truly honest with myself, I truly doubt that muscle memory alone can account for drawing a pulser. A lot more data processing has to happen even prior to that, as you have correctly implied.
Whatever it all takes to put it all together, the memory space required to program it all might can be both expanded and further compressed to support an even more enhanced suite of primitives and programming power.
Consider the case of the Admiral taking a pulser from a drawer by the phone in response to a key phrase and shooting himself. Unless he always stands in the exact same way with respect to the drawer and the pulser never moves about, then even that simple response cannot be "muscle memory" alone: he has to see and grasp the knob on the drawer and then locate and grasp the handle of the pulser. Only after the pulser is in a familiar position in his hand can pure "muscle memory" come into play.
-snip-
Talk about hitting the nail on the head.
It seems as if all of the Admiral's other faculties were working as well. Like his kinesthetic sense which enabled him to know where he was in relationship with his surroundings and, get this, in relationship to himself. If someone under compulsion is not of sound "mind" and "body" then how can they be even self aware? In accordance with the "Philosopher's stone."
This is one of my main disconnects about compulsion. The author says it is not mind control. But if it isn't some mechanism to control "all of the mind" then there is nobody at the Conn, in the engine room, navigation, etc. Someone under compulsion would either give a new meaning to "Hello, is there anybody home" or give a new glimpse into old philosophical theories about "the mind the body the soul and the spirit."
I would certainly like to chat with an MA philosopher. He should be able to fill in the blanks of a lot of age-old philosophical questions posited by philosophers like Kierkegaard, and Heidegger.
...
Duh! Alphas!