tlb wrote:cthia wrote:I don't think any government has any business meddling with the Constitution of any government.
tlb wrote:The Solarian League surrendered to the Grand Alliance; the main term of that surrender was the writing of a new constitution acceptable to to victors.
cthia wrote:I am not arguing that the term of the surrender to Honor was the writing of a new Constitution. I am arguing whether or not that SHOULD be the case. Unless Manticore and Honor can cause the whole of the SL to also rewrite its fully indoctrinated centuries long (c)onstitution, what has been gained? Regardless of what would have been forced to be written on paper by the Germans, unless Nazism is stamped out of the hearts and minds it is just a pipedream.
It would have been so much simpler if you had said this from the start, but instead you wrote "Manticore does not have the right to meddle in the SL's
Constitution. The war simply does not give Manticore that right. Victory gave them the right to meddle with their constitution, but not their Constitution."
The problem with that statement is that it is much easier to force a change in the Constitution, than it is to force a change in beliefs. Fortunately that is not the problem here; the people of the Solarian League do not have a belief set that resulted in the exploitation of the Verge, that was only a result of the corrupt bureaucracy and the unregulated corporations. It was only those problems that the Convention was tasked to correct, so there is no reason to expect that the new constitution will be soon be rewritten or ignored.
That may have been simpler to say, but it would not have accurately conveyed my meaning. I agree that it needed expounding, so I did.
However, I did not consider that my sentiments would be analyzed out of context. When I say that Manticore has no right to meddle in the SL's Constitution, I stand by it.
For instance, war does not give a victor the "right" to do as he pleases. War gives a victor the opportunity to take liberties, yes, but it does not give them a human right to do so.
War does not give a victor an unalienable right to steal a government's priceless heirlooms, yet they oftentimes do. We hear all of the time of how these priceless heirlooms have finally been returned to their rightful resting place after decades.
War does not give a victor the right to rape the women of the conquered, or perform any number of other common atrocities just because they can. Although it has been happening for centuries, civilized governments now ban together to set things right. And these governments call out such acts for what they are. War crimes.
Likewise, IMHO, war does not give a victor the "right" to meddle with another government's Constitution. The fact that it is done anyway does not make it "right" on any moral or human level.
No government will like its precious Constitution being "essentially" written by any foreign power; on that we seem to agree. But definitely not by a conquerer at gunpoint.
A victor has historically always gotten away with it by having enough weight in the britches to back it up. But if the smaller "nail" in those other britches becomes the hammer then he will likely nail your balls to the wall. So I personally don't recommend toying with an enemy's manhood if he will undoubtedly grow much bigger than you are and want to swallow you whole.
Constitutions are sacred and this is old Terra, the cradle of civilization. Is there anyone who does not imagine the initial discussion going on in Chambers being something like this ...
"WHO THE HELL DO THESE NEOBARBS THINK THEY ARE MEDDLING WITH OUR CONSTITUTION!"
It is their (c)onstitution that needs to be changed. I agree that that is a difficult task to accomplish. But summoning an enemy's demons by inciting the worst ingredients of his (c)onstitution by MEDDLING with his precious, longest lived Constitution doesn't sound like a very good plan to me. YMMV.
It is just not acceptable, and it won't be if something can be done about it down the road. War has always had the unspoken onus of civilized governments to handle victory, well, responsibly.
Constitutions are personal. Living with the knowledge that their precious Constitution was forced to be rewritten at gunpoint might be a constant source of aggrievement. One doesn't want another's aggrievements to become personal. That is what created many malignant war machines. That is how the MAlign was created.
At what point does constant aggrievements become its own toxic form of aggression? --Mark Olsen, Los Angeles Times, 1 App. 2022
The SL had to learn that the hard way. Will history repeat itself elsewhere in the Galaxy?
Honor's is the hand that rocked the
Cradle of Civilization. We must be gentle when we rock the cradle, or the baby will wake up and protest very loudly out of annoyance. Perhaps Honor should have rocked the cradle more gently by using her biological hand instead.