tlb wrote:cthia wrote:I keep crossing those wires with the excursion Honor took thru Andermani Space as a shortcut. There could have been a misunderstanding then. In fact, that is one reason Honor revealed her secret. In order to prevent any of those misunderstandings.
Honor did not reveal any secrets in
Honor Among Enemies; Chien-lu Anderman, Herzog von Rabenstrange, already knew everything about her mission and was prepared to support it.
But again you may be thinking of the visit during
War of Honor when she revealed the pulser built into her arm; as a way of showing good faith.
It wasn't
just to show good faith, was it? Didn't Honor realize that the pulser could be detected later on? In which case it COULD have also led to a misunderstanding.
tlb wrote:Your point about misunderstandings that can lead to war is valid; however a look at history seems to indicate that people often go to war because of misunderstandings about their capabilities, [cut]
I certainly can agree with that, however, I think that is ALWAYS the case. Do we ever really know the true capabilities of our enemies? Do they really know ours? Do we truly even realize our own true capabilities? Besides, when it is a matter of life or death, will capabilities even matter in the decision of whether to go to war?
What people don't realize is that "go to war" is a very broad term. Currently it could mean attacking one's computers, hacking, biological warfare, espionage, terrorist attacks, attacks on democracy. These tactics somewhat level the playing field.
At any rate, people go to war because they have been wronged, or they feel they have been wronged, threatened, or because their enemy is cruel, heartless, expansionistic or just plain evil, or malignant, or simply because they are human or ...
tlb wrote:[continued] not because of any misunderstandings about the ambitions of their enemies. A book example is the Peoples' Republic of Haven going to war with Manticore.
That is simply not true. In fact, the war with the MAlign is a HUGE example of going to war with an enemy whose ambitions you haven't got a clue. It happens a lot. Were Hitler's ambitions ever truly known by the Allied Forces?
In fact, were Haven's or the League's or the Andermani's ambitions ever really known?
For that matter, I am unsure if Grayson or Masada knew each other's real ambitions. I think they only knew that each of them wanted the other dead.
The misunderstanding of an enemy at his core is what psychologists and philosophists think leads to war. It is our unwillingness and impossibility of getting to know one another that leads to war. That is the prevailing synopsis anyway. That is why Houseman couldn't understand that there was only one way to bury the hatchet between Grayson and Masada.