cthia wrote:The most important thing in war has never been the delivery system itself. It has always been about getting an enormous amount of firepower in range of the enemy. It doesn't matter if you have to shoot that firepower with a slingshot, launch it with a catapult, sail it over on a homemade raft, or drop it from what is essentially a tank with wings in the form of a B-52 bomber.
It wouldn't matter if the delivery systems are wooden ships, a canoe or a rowboat, just as long as they can get in close enough to get the job done. And if it has enough destructive power to destroy battleships and carriers, then that is certainly getting the job done. Heck, a motorized raft will do the job if it is mounted with a railgun and it can get close enough. Or if it fires 3-second grasers.
This delivery system discussion reminds me of the interesting fact that the first successful self-propelled torpedo, the Whitehead torpedo, was actually perfected in England only a year after the American Civil War -- so very early in the ironclad era.
In fact a number of unarmored wooden sail & steam ships mounted torpedo launchers -- and I'm aware of at least one case were a Whitehead torpedo was fired in anger from such a ship.
[Edit - I'd originally written "unarmed" when I meant "unarmored"]
That was in the May 1877 Battle of Pacocha, in the Pacific off Peru's coast. The Royal Navy HMS Shah, an unarmored steam frigate (so, sailed powered with auxiliary steam propulsion) whose armament included 4 torpedo launchers, was part of a small British force fighting the Peruvian sea-going ironclad turret monitor Huáscar. During the fight Shaw launched a Whitehead torpedo at Huáscar -- but it missed.
This was actually the earliest combat use of a self-propelled torpedo.
So, not quite a rowboat, but still you don't generally think of a wooden sailing ship launching torpedoes at you
