Jonathan_S wrote:Relax wrote:Empires: Yesterday, Today, and future.
Someone made a map of all the worlds empires. From the capital of said empire they drew lines in terms of days of travel.
That seems to be overstating the historical case significantly (or at least understating how long further stretches' of empire were held).
Yes, I did overemphasize the distinction of core/extremities on purpose. More to kick the discussion off a bit. Or should I say, add this point into the discussion to uh, overemphasize that the BSDF and its unit composition will be a short term consideration. Of course what do we do with the Gregor/Andermani with the terminus literally in their empire. Language seems an obvious distinction as a limit for total interaction between the two. I keep thinking of Canada here, Quebec may as well be its own country inside another country and the only true reason they are part of Canada at all is because of the St. Lawrence Seaway and if the French speakers were in BC instead of Quebec, I think they would be their separate country and not part of Canada at all.
Another classic example of over 1-->2 weeks travel time is the Persian Empire(foot/horse) and its many iterations and expanded greatly with horse couriers which massively sped up communications. When the Core is so big and unified it tends to "extend" the periphery more than normal.
PS: The time quotient for the Roman Empire to the UK is a bit of a stretch as that was only in one direction and directions such as northern coast of Black Sea, much closer were not subjugated. Obviously natural resource reasons dominate as a massive factor. UK had Silver/Gold and a low population so holding it was not a massive problem. Honestly same reason the UK/Spain were able to invade/hold the Western Hemisphere. Low population. Honorverse does not seem to have any major systematic natural resource problem other than wormhole junctions... which the "good guys" have ruthlessly taken advantage of.