ThinksMarkedly wrote:Sigs wrote:But the SLN can deploy at insane numbers of SD(P)'s and escorts if they so choose and all without breaking the bank, they don't have to choose, they can have a lot of everything.
That assumption is not a given.
We know it wasn't true before the end of the war. The SL federal government could not tax directly and therefore their budget was limited. Even if they were efficiently collecting and using those funds, they'd still be limited.
They're writing a new constitution now. Whether the new one will allow direct taxation or not is unknown. I expect that it will either NOT allow direct taxation (thus limiting the federal budget) or it will cause a lot of systems to secede from the League (also limiting the federal budget). Or a third alternative may be a compromise that was acceptable to most wavering members to limit how much can be directly taxed, at least during peace time, but the end result is again that the federal budget is limited.
And as Theemile wrote above, we don't know when that will be ready either. Until then, the SL is broke.
There's always the possibility of one or more member systems picking up part of the R&D on their own. Even building on their own, and sharing the designs with other like-minded systems.
ThinksMarkedly wrote:But if you want a missile-defence escort, you have no template. What can they copy? What is the best displacement-to-missile throw weight ratio? How many tubes are sufficient? Where's the inflection point for when it's good enough but cheap enough?
I'm not saying making a Cimiterre knock-off is easy. I'm saying it's much easier than coming up with something radically new and not proven by anyone else before.
You're letting the perfect be the mortal enemy of the good enough. Especially given the potential of individual systems building destroyers in huge numbers. The "good enough" solution would be to rip all the offensive systems out of a War Harvest destroyer design and replace all of that tonnage with point defenses and CM tubes, with all the fire control and magazine capacity to store way more CMs on board than any LAC could ever imagine. It might not be ideal, but it would have the virtue of being able to rush through design and see the first hulls operational within a year or two - long before carriers could be built even if they had the LACs to put on them.
Plus, there's no reason to assume they're going to have to pick one solution instead of both. Dedicated anti-missile destroyers could be effective, or they could be nothing more than a stop-gap while the SLN works on all the various revolutionary techs needed to make effective screen LACs.