cthia wrote:Garth2 wrote:As for the hit at Cosmo, the police suspected it was Young but could not prove it (at that time)
To be honest the one plot hole (if it real is) was the governments response to the "wild allegations", they should have respond with a default statement rather than being silent e.g. "Lord Young, like any citizen can take these allegations to court. Where they will be investigated and if Mrs Harrington is <blah, blah> - I'll leave it to you work out why he hasn't"
This post reeks of the same strategy that I suggested Burdette could use. Tie everything up in court and possibly expose a loose thread in the enemy camp.
I'll get to Burdette later, but if Young would have been willing to take a chill pill and grind at Honor, a court battle could have caused her problems.
Heck, a lot of the things the government - or members of the navy - did for her was criminal. The assault on Summervale's chalet was criminal. Certain people in the navy conspiring against him during his refit was questionable at the very least, criminal at best. Yadda yadda yadda.
Garth2 wrote:Actually, as point out in text, Pavel taking Honor to court at this point in time would be the WORST thing he could do hence why it would be the best thing for the Government (or at least Allen Summervale, Duke Cromarty) not only would it a tie Young up in knots and burn political capital he didn't have but once the court ruled in Honor favour (she just plays the tape, how it came into her possession wouldn't be a factor (as Pavel himself mentions)) the scandal might force out of the House of Lords or at very least wreck the power of the blackmail files (after all who would believe him after the court case)
In addition, it would also remove Allen cousin as someone else would eliminate him (as he himself alludes to).
Plus allow for Honor to enter the House of Lords without the problems that happened from the way she did it
refit
How was the Navy refit "criminal", a Captain requested a refit and it was granted by the relevant authority as per the chain of command?
Chalet
I agree the "assault" on the chalet was criminal (as we have "inside knowledge") but I bet all the official records clearly demonstrate that it was a legitimate mistake specially as those "guests" wouldn't want to make a fuss
What "tapes" are we talking about here? Did I miss another memo?
The refit was criminal under the surface if Young's legal team can prove how it was used to hinder the duty of a Captain and an officer of the Queen's navy. The good ol' boy network might have weaknesses that can be exploited by the NH Files. A high powered legal team has ways to get at the truth. Plus, we can not underestimate Young receiving anonymous help from Honor's many enemies. Heck, the MAlign would love to assist Young behind the scenes in this matter.
My point is Young could embarrass the government at the expense of the war effort. Honor would suffer if the choice is her or the war effort. Nobody witnessed the rape attempt. He can claim Honor became angry when he spurned
her advances. He could claim Honor had plans to sleep her way to the top. Unlikely to hold water, until he adds "She is a heavy worlder. What normal gravity idiot would be stupid enough to try and rape a heavy worlder?" At any rate, it would come down to his word against hers. That was an impossible proposition even in Honor's eyes. Who would believe a lowly baseborn Commoner over a Lord?
By law, Young only has to sow a seed of reasonable doubt.
Interesting post Garth2. BTW, is it a fact Young wouldn't have been able to afford a high powered legal team? I wouldn't think that Young was exactly pinching pennies.