Theemile wrote:Actually, The Solarian League PASSED on the Laserhead - the version shown to them was anemic and unable to thwart standard sidewalls in the 1830s. The Andermani picked up the tech and developed it further and deployed it in a capital missile in 1869 - Manticore's tech gathering network put them on the trail and they developed it independently in ~1870 making them #2 to field the new laserhead in their mk 19 capital missile.
The Solarian League was the last major power to field the tech in the late 1880s.
David has said that the SLN has become very conservative in fielding weapons tech; due to the size of their fleet, they don't want to start a weapons revolution where a majority of their fleet is outdated and requires replacement or costly refurbishment to face off with smaller powers. So, the SLN sees NOT developing technology as important to maintaining it's powerful position as developing it.
Now you may say, "we are discussing missiles, not ship parts". At this time, the cost of missiles equaled the cost of the carrying ship, most of the time. The thought of replacing all their current missiles was a daunting task for the SLN - enough so that they would not do so until they were satisfied that 1) the tech really was superior, 2) was necessary to win future combats and 3) was mature enough that it would not be replaced several times in a short period as the technology matured.
Which is why they got their butts kicked in 1923.
Also navies have a tendency to design their ships to defend against weapons equivalent to their own. The (often unstated) rational is that you're trying to make your weapons the best and you have the most information about them, so its more practical to show the design is balanced and able to defend against attacks it can dish out.
Under that logic if the SLN adopted the laserhead not only would they have to update all their missiles; but they'd have to start designing warships around armor optimized against laserheads and refitting existing ships based on point defense that could stop missiles beyond 30,000km. (So immediately junk all the autocannon; but also shift the defensive balance towards CMs and away from PDLCs. That requires extensive changes (unless you do a half-ass rush job like Aegis; which is unlikely to be acceptable in peacetime) to the ship. More holes in the armor for more CM tubes; enlarged or additional CM magazines, more CM fire control links, etc. So a change in missile is also, almost inevitably, a change in ship design too.