Imaginos1892 wrote:No, this didn’t come out of nowhere; these leftist rent-a-riots have been escalating for years, with the SAME RIOTERS showing up in cities hundreds of miles apart. The really interesting thing is, ALL of the supposed ‘triggering events’ have taken place in left-wing cities. Saint Louis. Baltimore. Los Angeles. New York. And now, Minneapolis.
The Governor of Minnesota is a leftist Democrat. The Minnesota Attorney General is a leftist Democrat. The Mayor of Minneapolis is a leftist Democrat. Twelve Minneapolis City Council members are leftist Democrats, and the thirteenth one is a leftist Green.
If there is any remaining vestige of that ‘long and sordid history of institutionalized racism’ you constantly screech about, it is an exclusive and jealously guarded property of The Left.
Of course, that would be no surprise to anyone the least bit familiar with U.S. history. The Democrats have always been the racist party. It was founded on racism 170 years ago, and has perpetuated racism ever since. Thirty years ago, under the Republicans, racism was well on its way to quietly dying out. Ever since the Democrats regained power they have been straining to bring it back, as big and nasty as they can make it. RAAAACISSSM!! is trumpeted everywhere, pushed by the Democrats.
So far, the left-wing rioters you admire have murdered at least 3 people. The ‘white idiots with guns’ did not threaten, attack or kill anybody, did not burn down cities, or wreck people’s livelihoods. So much for your bleatings about the importance of life, you sanctimonious sack of shit.
Yes yes yes, I already know you don't believe that institutional racism is a thing.
The E wrote:policing by consent
You expect criminals to consent to being arrested for their crimes? What HAVE you been smoking?
You know what I find fascinating? How predictable you are. You see, there's a pretty clear pattern in your responses to my posts: Whenever I use some shorthand that is commonly known within at least some circles, you are so incurious and desperate to dunk on me that you make yourself look like an idiot by completely misunderstanding what the referenced concept is.
In this case, "policing by consent" is a reference to what is also called the Peelian principles (that page being one of the top entries if you google "policing by consent", incidentally); a set of philosophies and guidelines for ethical policework developed in the 1820s. These principles are, partially or fully, cornerstones of modern policing nearly everywhere; Details may differ, but I think there are some fundamental truths about what the relationship between the police force and the populace needs to be in order for police to be effective in a modern democracy in there.
So, Imaginos: if you encounter something nonsensical or that you do not know (like "policing by consent" or Colin Kaepernick) it is perfectly okay to Google first and post later. Just imagine how much less of an idiot you will appear to be!