Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: tlb and 37 guests

How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by tlb   » Tue May 26, 2020 6:44 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4438
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

tlb wrote:So your analysis is correct for the period of Operation Cutworm, but will shortly be completely invalid because of the deployment of Apollo. The leaders of Haven realized when reviewing the results of the attack on Lovat that their fleet was becoming obsolete. At that point their only viable choice was to win before their numerical superiority was reduced to just presenting more targets for the RMN. If anything the demonstration of Apollo at Lovat was too effective.

Sigs wrote:The RHN planned Beatrice before Lovat, they had no way of knowing it was coming and they had no way of knowing their numerical advantage would evaporate that quickly.

That is exactly what is wrong with your analysis: yes it was planned as a contingency before Lovat; which means that they did not expect to need it, but wanted it ready. After Lovat, it stopped being a contingency and became a necessity because of the changed circumstance. You seem to be saying that military leaders should never have contingent emergency plans!

This is what RFC said about Beatrice in the following post: The problem with Haven
Operation Beatrice, leading to the Battle of Manticore, was a last ditch option she never wanted to pursue in the first place. Beatrice was launched only after Manticore had resumed military operations after breaking off the comprehensive negotiations Pritchart had proposed and Elizabeth had accepted, and it wouldn’t have been launched even then if the RMN hadn’t demonstrated the existence and potential of Apollo. However they’d gotten to that point, the only real options available to Eloise at that time were to surrender or to launch Beatrice in hopes that Apollo was in sufficiently limited deployment that Haven could secure a victory before Manticore was in a position to devastate or conquer the Haven System itself. She’d done her damnedest to create new peace talks, only to have Manticore walk away from them. The domestic political situation — and the domestic Havenite perception of the war — meant that she couldn’t unilaterally lay down her sword without revealing the truth about Giancola and she had no proof of that truth. (EDIT: I should also add here that without that proof, she couldn’t go public — at least until Victor and Anton came back with evidence that the MA had been behind it [even though the MA hadn’t been behind it ] — lest she be accused of following in the footsteps of the rulers of the PRH and disappearing political enemies, then accusing them of heinous crimes when they were no longer around to dispute the charges. Had she been perceived as doing that, it would have gutted the entire effort to restore the old Republic because the supposed “restorers” would have been revealed as just as bad as any of their predecesors. She’d dedicated her life to restoring political accountability and the rule of law. If she was seen as simply using those principles in her own quest for power, the Republic’s citizens would have had no reason to trust the integrity of any institution she'd set up/restored and any corrupt successor or would-be successor would have been held to a far lower standard.) The entire rationale for the proposal of fresh peace talks was that the parties were in a sufficiently balanced state of parity that negotiations would be between two equals, and she fully intended to offer the most generous terms possible. That had been snatched away from her when it had literally been within her grasp; Manticore had resumed active operations; and Apollo once again had given Manticore what amounted to tactical supremacy. Perhaps she should have accepted defeat and surrendered, but if she’d done so, the consequences might well have been fatal for the Republic’s restoration. She had to make the call one way or the other, and she chose against the high probability of losing everything she, Theisman, and the other reformers had fought for years to accomplish. And I might point out that her fear of losing that had less to do with a sense of personal loss than it did with her awareness of what it would mean for the Republic of Haven if it fell back into the hands of another Rob Pierre or Oscar Saint-Just, or a new version of the Legislaturalists.
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by kzt   » Tue May 26, 2020 6:48 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Sigs wrote:But why did they need to keep the RHN off balance and dispersed if they were so near parity? If the MA and the RHN had ~420 SD(P)'s each and the MA SD(P)'s were as good as 1.3 RHN SD(P)'s why were they worried? Even if the RHN had 620 SD(P)'s the MA and their 420 SD(P)'s will still be within shouting distance of the RHN. The reason they were tried so hard to disperse the RHN's concentrated strength was because it was overwhelming.

I'm not sure where the 420 SD(P)s comes from.

At AAC Haven had ~520, plus 100 not fully combat effective. This was up from 316 at the start of 1920.

At the start of 1920 the RMN had 75, minus the ~21 that got blown up, plus new construction. Most SD(P) are in Home Fleet and 3rd Fleet.

At the start of 1920 Grayson had 115. A large portion of that was anchored to Grayson

At the start of 1920 the Andies had 42, plus new construction.
RMN and IAN construction was delivering new ships right before Beatrice, but they were new ships that needed to be worked up/shaken down. And their yards were not delivering hundreds like Bolthole was.
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by Theemile   » Tue May 26, 2020 7:04 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5241
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

kzt wrote:
Sigs wrote:But why did they need to keep the RHN off balance and dispersed if they were so near parity? If the MA and the RHN had ~420 SD(P)'s each and the MA SD(P)'s were as good as 1.3 RHN SD(P)'s why were they worried? Even if the RHN had 620 SD(P)'s the MA and their 420 SD(P)'s will still be within shouting distance of the RHN. The reason they were tried so hard to disperse the RHN's concentrated strength was because it was overwhelming.

I'm not sure where the 420 SD(P)s comes from.

At AAC Haven had ~520, plus 100 not fully combat effective. This was up from 316 at the start of 1920.

At the start of 1920 the RMN had 75, minus the ~21 that got blown up, plus new construction. Most SD(P) are in Home Fleet and 3rd Fleet.

At the start of 1920 Grayson had 115. A large portion of that was anchored to Grayson

At the start of 1920 the Andies had 42, plus new construction.
RMN and IAN construction was delivering new ships right before Beatrice, but they were new ships that needed to be worked up/shaken down. And their yards were not delivering hundreds like Bolthole was.


Thev Andies were building 120 Adler's total. ~40 were completed pre-war, and required updates to fire capicator MDMs before they could be fielded. The remaining ~80 were moded during construction to fire fusion MDMs and carry Keyhole 2s. They were taking forever and the Emperor halted 1/2 and focused construction in ~40 ships. These were the SD(p)s Honor as getting to flush out 8th fleet just prior to Beatrice. So as of BoMA, the Andermani fielded fewer than 80 SD(p)s, and 1/2 did not have Keyhole. Also, some were held back for defense and not available for Alliance use.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Wed May 27, 2020 1:06 am

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

Skipping the parts where I think we're in violent agreement, just failing to explain so to each other.

Sigs wrote:
I agree with your first paragraph and disagree with the second. If Theisman said that there was a good chance the forces sent to Manticore could extricate themselves, he had very good reason to believe so. He wasn't padding the numbers or trying to tell Pritchart what she wanted to hear. He was being honest. And as I said before: he was right, until Apollo changed everything.
If I gave you a parachute and told you to jump from 10,000 feet with the understanding that there is "a good chance" the parachute will open will you do it?


That's not even remotely comparable. I don't know you and I don't know your qualifications.

Let me change it to more comparable: if my parachute instructor, who has prepared parachutes for me and for others before, tells me that this will open before I hit the ground, I'll trust him.

Theisman is not an unknown person to Prichart and he's not reckless.

Attacking Trevor's Star and crushing 3rd Fleet and 8th Fleet when they are outnumbered by the RHN 4.2 to 1 and even with their tech advantage it is 3.2 to 1. The RHN gets to crush 20% of the Alliance capital ships and suffer significantly less casualties, they remove the forward operations base from the middle of their territory and then can launch against Manticore with a newly reinforced fleet of 330 SD(P)'s. At that point Manticore might be warned ahead of time but what exactly are they going to do? They can strip all their wallers from Alizon and Zanzibar, they can beg Grayson for some wallers and they can speed up refits and half-ass it but can they really form a fleet of 100 SD(P)'s or more in a month or two after Trevor's Star? Probably not, so the RHN goes into Manticore with overwhelming firepower and crushes Home Fleet without worrying about Trevor's Star. But at that point of cancelation of the summit the RHN crushing the defences of Trevor's Star and then asking for another summit might accomplish more than going to Manticore, trashing their industry to prove that you are the good guy and are being manipulated.


How do you know those weren't Operation Aurelie or Operation Danielle? Theisman said there were multiple operations possible and he gave Pritchart all of them in detail, he only chose to brief her directly on Beatrice and Camille. I suppose because Camille was the most likely and Beatrice because he really needed to explain himself.



At All costs Ch.7
"So," Caparelli said, "looking at every pod-laying waller we can scrape up between us, Grayson, and the Andies, and including all of the Any current SD(P)'s currently in commission as fully effective units, we have a total of two hundred thirty-two. Assuming out construction times hold up, and allowing for working up time, we can have a total of 400 within the next 11 to 18 months."....


Also in the same chapter they discuss how there could be 400-450 SD(P)'s under construction in Bolthole alone that started aafter the announcement by the Republic about having SD(P)'s. Then there were an estimated 400 SD(P)'s under construction in Haven and 2-3 other central systems. According to the book the construction of those SD(P)'s started in late 1919 6-8 months after the RoH announced possession of SD(P)'s.


Any SD(P) started after the announcement wouldn't be ready by May 1921. There's just not enough time. The shipyards besides Bolthole may have finished a few SD(P)s that had been started before the announcement but hadn't yet differentiated into pod-layers. Not more than 50, I'd say.

If Bolthole's capacity is 400 now and they had finished 315 before Thunderbolt, then let's strike the middle and say 357 were produced in the second wave. That's at most 315 + 357 + 50 = 722 SD(P)s total ever built. From that, you have to remove those lost before May 1921.

That number is closer to 620 than to 956.

Where exactly did he say he counted them in the total? He said they have a good chance to retreat if the enemy is stronger than estimated, where did he say that half or a third of the forces are counted in those 620 SD(P)'s used for defence of the republic? And how exactly does that work? I have 620 SD(P)'s for defence of the nation, but I have 335 of them in offensive operations against the heaviest defended system in history but since they have a good chance of extracting themselves from anything I will use them in my defensive deployments because I just know they will come back.


Basically, yes. He clearly said that he believed the forces he sent to Manticore could extricate themselves. There is no discussion about this point.

We can only discuss whether whatever was left was a decent defence of his nation or whether that was reckless.



And if things didn't go as planned they would be in a significantly worse position than the Alliance. They are gambling, if things go well they win the war, if things go bad they end up facing the 250-290 SD(P)'s of the MA with ~180 fully Operational SD(P)'s and 100 working up SD(P)'s. And they are gambling even worse if they only have 80 SD(P)'s left over after Beatrice.


You're painting an impossible scenario: 336 ships drive into a black hole and don't damage almost any enemy ship. Was he sending those ships full of Stormtroopers?

If there was a reasonable chance of that happening, I would agree it was reckless. But I don't think that chance was reasonable. Non-zero, yes; but not high enough to warrant holding back.

And once again: this was the planning stage before Lovat happened. The Operation wasn't authorised yet. And as posted above, RFC said that neither Theisman nor Pritchart wanted to launch it. It was a contingency. So we can transfer the question of whether it was reckless to launch it to whether it was reckless to pre-deploy a portion of the ships.

When you are planning something like this, don't look at what happens if everything goes right, look at what happens if everything goes wrong.


Agreed, but at the same time you don't plan for the unreasonable. You don't plan for "all of our ships suffer engineering causalties at low speed soon after crossing the hyper limit." You don't plan for "Manticore has superweapon that can crush everything". Also because if they do, then it doesn't matter how many ships you hold back anyway.

Those things can happen, but if you let the absolute worst dictate your actions, you'll be paralysed and won't win.


How is it too small a chance? Does Theisman know every variable involved in the defence? Does Tourville know everything he is facing? Giscard? Do the two sides get together once a month to compare notes and keep each other appraised of what the other is doing? What if they run into the MA's version of Moriarty? Get inside the hyper limit and find out that there is a hell of a lot more firepower thanks to that platform for them to handle.


If there's anything that can seriously damage Second Fleet without trashing Home Fleet in the process, Chin never translates to n-space. She takes her 96 SD(P)s and 30 CLACs back home without firing a single shot.

Chin only engages the MA forces after Second Fleet has engaged and crippled Home Fleet, and ascertained that the Python Lump is still in the yards. In fact, sending RDs to see if the yards are full of SD(P)s nearing completion is one of the first things the Second Fleet CO would do. If he finds them empty, he'd operate differently, possibly by going to the hyper limit and going home.

All of this would be worked out in advance. All of those contingencies in case of the unexpected and worst-case scenarios.


And there is ALWAYS the chance that something goes wrong, so leaving yourself no fallback is criminal.


I disagree that 184 effective SD(P)s and 100 working up ones, plus CLACs, are "no fallback" and "criminal."


Wasn't it you who argued that the RHN had only 80 SD(P)'s remaining after committing Beatrice? I'd say the MA would have a hell of a lot more left over than the RHN.


I did and I was wrong. Textev clearly shows at least 620 SD(P)s total.

If the MA had "a hell of a lot more" after Beatrice, that means they had "a bigger hell of a lot more" before Beatrice or they can suddenly deploy the ships they couldn't before. That's balance-shifting and all the more reason to attack than not to.

Even if they have 160SD(P)'s left for defence with another 100 SD(P)'s working up the MA can strip all the SD(P)'s from the Andermani Home system, Zanzibar, Alizon, Basilisk half of the Grayson Home Fleet and all of Third Fleet to attack the Republic BEFORE they find out what happened with 2nd and 5th Fleet. And they can be back before the RHN can react. Yeah its a gamble but very quickly you can gather 145 SD(P)'s into one force, hit 2 or 3 of the RHN's most important systems and be back in Trevor's Star before the RHN hears about the BoM. In the process the MA crushes another 50-60 RHN SD(P)'s along with 20% of their SD(P) construction, they will be back defending Grayson, Trevor's Star and Manticore before an attack could be mounted on any of those systems, by the time they are back the RMN Python Lump should be ready for deployment. RoH moral is fully in the crapper because they lost 60-90% of their fleet in 20% of their shipyards.


And that isn't reckless? You're the one arguing against reckless operations; stripping all of your critical systems of their defenders on the chance that there isn't another RHN force doing reckless stuff is even more reckless.

Let me repeat that either Home Fleet is destroyed or Chin never shows up. They are mutually-exclusive options. So if Home Fleet remains, no one in the MA knows that there are another 96 SD(P)s and 30 CLACs out of defensive positions.

Conversely, if Chin made an appearance, then Home Fleet was decimated and Eighth Fleet is redeployed. The Python Lump can't be combat effective for another few months (they were working up when Oyster Bay hit), so they wouldn't be left as the only defence of the critical systems. And there's only one system they could reach in time to take up defence: the Manticore Binary System.


Only if the RHN wall of Battle was 920 SD(P)'s. If it's 620 SD(P)'s you run the potential to lose either 54% of your modern wall or 80% of your modern wall...both of which are well north of 1/3.


Only if you lose all of them. My calculation was that they lost two thirds of Beatrice, so one third comes back, in exchange for destroying Home Fleet and half of Third Fleet. By the time they do come back, the 100 SD(P)s working up are near done, so that's 284 + 112 = 396 ships left. That's 63% of the original 620.

When the stakes are the future of your entire nation and people, risky plans should be avoided unless no other choice is given.


I agree. And there was no other choice when they launched Beatrice.

We're not arguing that. We're arguing whether a) preparing for Beatrice was reasonable and b) if Beatrice had a good chance of success after whatever prompted its launch revealed itself.


Home Fleet and 8th Fleet are in Manticore as are the missing IAN SD(P)’s. The Python Lump was pushed through so now there are 100 SD(P)’s at the junction coming through for a planned offensive against all the systems Haven captured during Thunderbolt…


First, if the Python Lump is out, then the operation is different or scrubbed. Everyone in the Manticore System can tell when dozens of SD(P)s start leaving Hephaestus, so the Havenite spies would advise the Second Fleet CO when it emerges.

Second, Eighth Fleet would not come into the Manticore-A hyperlimit. Why would they be 38 hours out of position? And reveal their strength to the spies in the Junction, which they would have to pass through? Similarly as above, the Second Fleet CO would know that Eighth Fleet had transited into the MBS before he crossed the hyper-limit.

Third, any offensive against the RoH would be launched from Trevor's Star, so those 100 SD(P)s are not coming into Manticore, but out of it. Even if that's what you meant, there's no reason for those SD(P)s to be parked at the Junction. They'd be transiting as quickly as they arrived. And where did these 100 SD(P)s that are not the Python Lump come from? The Andermani? If it's the Andermani, they're coming from the Gregor terminus and are therefore not sticking around the Junction. For there to be 100 SD(P)s at the Junction, they can't be Andermani or Grayson because they need to come via hyperspace. And Beatrice would have to be incredibly unlucky to commence in the half hour between their arrival and their transit.

And again like above, but this time with textev to prove it, the attack scouted the Junction, so they'd see those 100 SD(P)s and immediately fly to Manticore to advise Second Fleet that there's a force that is at least as big as Third and Eighth Fleets combined coming their way.

Finally, that also means that Eighth Fleet is suddenly 3x bigger than before. All the more reason to end the war now by crippling the Manticoran infrastructure.

The only scenario that changes the situation so dramatically that a hail mary is a good option is Apollo, anything else the RHN will be able to catch up shortly. Afterall the MA knows that by end of 1921 the RHN would have 1,200 SD(P)’s with more under construction, even with the python lump we are talking about 600-700 SD(P)’s in the Alliance fleet and that is a maybe, against 1,200 SD(P)’s in the RHN. The RHN still maintains its advantage.


I can even agree with you and that doesn't change the facts because Operation Beatrice wasn't actually launched until after Apollo was revealed. Without Apollo, Pritchart might have chosen Operation Aurelie, Camille, Danielle, Emilie, or Francine. Some of which could have used the pre-deployed forces that Beatrice called for.


Most of the ships had to be deployed ahead of time, otherwise the BoM wouldn’t have happened two months after Lovat.


200 out of 336 is "most" (nearly 60%).

I mean you have to get news of what happened in Lovat, take some time to figure out what really happened, make a decision, send orders for the ships in various locations to gather, concentrate that fleet in one location and drill them etc. They had most of the pieces in play except for the last of the fleet, send out the orders and wait. Just getting orders from Haven to the various bases would eat up most of the time, then those ships have to make their way to the rally point.


The ships that would be the ones to travel the furthest are the ones that would have left before Lovat. Those that were near Haven and could be reached and ordered quickly didn't need to leave just yet. Incidentally, the most important systems to Haven are those closest to it, like Jouett.


Trevor’s Star is in the heart of the republic, he is basically fighting a two front war, one is in the center of the republic against Trevor’s Star and one is on the western front against Manticore. Haven has at least half a dozen other industrially or economically important systems, or systems with enough pull in congress to warrant SD(P)’s. Do you think that the RoH as a democracy can tell its important member systems to f**k off when they demand protection?


Yes, though not in those words. Congress doesn't dictate military tactics, Theisman and the Octagon do. If they say that those systems are adequately protected, they are, whatever their definition of that is. Unlike a sovereign ally, there's little those systems can do. They can secede and declare themselves neutral, which removes the need to protect them in the first place. They can try to impeach Pritchart, but there's no guarantee they'll succeed.

Your 270 SD(P)’s are now further reduced because he has to maintain forces around Trevor’s Star, and the front where they would have forward bases, and at least half a dozen if not a dozen important systems within the republic each requiring between 8 and 30 SD(P)’s.


No, he doesn't. If there's one thing Cutworm had already proven at this point is that distance doesn't matter. There's no reason for the MA to attack unimportant systems and there's no reason for him to deploy significant forces there.


WhichFire off a couple of Ghost Rider platforms, come back a few days later take their intel and fire off a couple of more, come back in a few days later, fire off a couple of more platforms and pick up the original two. Constant intel flow, the RHN can keep their ships in stealth for a day or two or even a month but not forever.


A star system is a big place outside the hyperlimit. The RHN can keep fleets hidden indefinitely, especially if they are on the move. If the MA is lucky, they'll pick up a resupply and know that fleet is right there, right now. They can't know one day later if that fleet hasn't gone to another system, so the information isn't useful when it gets to the planners. And that's if the resupply happens in-system, not in hyperspace or in deep space, outside of Ghost Rider range. Add a couple of empty fleet trains doing round-trips to confuse the scouts and you really can't tell where those fleets are.

And none of this tells you what the strengths of those fleets is.

The ship deploying the Ghost Rider is also a dead giveaway that someone inserted into the system. Ghost Riders have finite endurance, finite acceleration, finite sensing range, and can't translate to hyperspace.
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by ThinksMarkedly   » Wed May 27, 2020 1:43 am

ThinksMarkedly
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4515
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 11:39 am

kzt wrote:I'm not sure where the 420 SD(P)s comes from.


There are two "420." One was my erroneous estimation of how many ships the RHN had, starting from 315 at the beginning of 1920 and committing 336 to Operation Beatrice.

The second is the estimation of how many ships the MA has.

At the start of 1920 the RMN had 75, minus the ~21 that got blown up, plus new construction. Most SD(P) are in Home Fleet and 3rd Fleet.

At the start of 1920 Grayson had 115. A large portion of that was anchored to Grayson

At the start of 1920 the Andies had 42, plus new construction.
RMN and IAN construction was delivering new ships right before Beatrice, but they were new ships that needed to be worked up/shaken down. And their yards were not delivering hundreds like Bolthole was.


But this is actually the Havenite estimate.

At All Costs, Ch. 54 wrote:"Basically, Beatrice is a direct attack on the Manticoran home system," Theisman told her. "There's not much finesse to it. We'll take forty-two battle squadrons—three hundred and thirty-six SD(P)s; equal to eighty-plus percent of their entire modern wall of battle, including the Andies, according to NavInt's current estimates"


336 / 0.80 = 420; 336 / 0.85 = 395

I think Theisman means SD(P)s when he says "modern wall of battle." Later in the same chapter,

[quote]"Forth, there's the Andermani. The Manties and Graysons have lost twenty superdreadnoughts—twelve of them pod-layers—since Thunderbolt wrapped up. That's about seven percent of their total podnoughts. But the Andies are still out there [...] By our estimates, they should have somewhere around a hundred and twenty pod-layers by now—just about a third of the Manticoran Alliancec's total—and we haven't seen them yet."[/quote[

12 / 0.07 = 171, but that's less than the 115+75 they started with. So Theisman was probably rounding 6.3% up to 7%. That also means this was the number from Thunderbolt, not of the moment he was talking to Pritchart.

120 / 395 = 30.3% is "just about a third". 120/420 = 28.6%, which I'd say "just over a quarter".

If it's 395, it means NavInt estimates the RMN + GSN has increased from 190 to 205. That's only 27 new construction, including replacing the twelve losses. That seems slightly too low: we know Manticore completed a few Invictus (Intolerant, Imperator, Intransigent, Incomparable, Second Ieltsin [I know it's with Y, but that doesn't fit the theme]), so they probably completed a few Medusas too, and the Grayson yards were not idle.

So the Alliance number is probably between 395 and 420 SD(P)s before the Beatrice.
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by kzt   » Wed May 27, 2020 2:54 am

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

ThinksMarkedly wrote:
Agreed, but at the same time you don't plan for the unreasonable. You don't plan for "all of our ships suffer engineering causalties at low speed soon after crossing the hyper limit." You don't plan for "Manticore has superweapon that can crush everything". Also because if they do, then it doesn't matter how many ships you hold back anyway.

Those things can happen, but if you let the absolute worst dictate your actions, you'll be paralyzed and won't win.

Taking counsel of your fears is not typically a path to military success. There are risks with any course of action in war, including the course of action of not acting because you are in decision paralysis.
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by kzt   » Wed May 27, 2020 3:24 am

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

ThinksMarkedly wrote:But this is actually the Havenite estimate.

At All Costs, Ch. 54 wrote:"Basically, Beatrice is a direct attack on the Manticoran home system," Theisman told her. "There's not much finesse to it. We'll take forty-two battle squadrons—three hundred and thirty-six SD(P)s; equal to eighty-plus percent of their entire modern wall of battle, including the Andies, according to NavInt's current estimates"


336 / 0.80 = 420; 336 / 0.85 = 395

I think Theisman means SD(P)s when he says "modern wall of battle." Later in the same chapter,

"Forth, there's the Andermani. The Manties and Graysons have lost twenty superdreadnoughts—twelve of them pod-layers—since Thunderbolt wrapped up. That's about seven percent of their total podnoughts. But the Andies are still out there [...] By our estimates, they should have somewhere around a hundred and twenty pod-layers by now—just about a third of the Manticoran Alliancec's total—and we haven't seen them yet."[/quote[

12 / 0.07 = 171, but that's less than the 115+75 they started with. So Theisman was probably rounding 6.3% up to 7%. That also means this was the number from Thunderbolt, not of the moment he was talking to Pritchart.

120 / 395 = 30.3% is "just about a third". 120/420 = 28.6%, which I'd say "just over a quarter".

If it's 395, it means NavInt estimates the RMN + GSN has increased from 190 to 205. That's only 27 new construction, including replacing the twelve losses. That seems slightly too low: we know Manticore completed a few Invictus (Intolerant, Imperator, Intransigent, Incomparable, Second Ieltsin [I know it's with Y, but that doesn't fit the theme]), so they probably completed a few Medusas too, and the Grayson yards were not idle.

So the Alliance number is probably between 395 and 420 SD(P)s before the Beatrice.

Well, they are wrong.

The counts at the start of 1920 are here: https://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/s ... ton/106/0/

The RMN production is delayed due to the changes to handle Apollo, and the state of production due to the previous regime.

Most all of the RMN SD(P) new production went to 8th fleet. And immediately post-Lovat 8th has a total of 15 SD(P)s.

Which was a lot better than what it started with: "The bottom line is that Eighth Fleet is something of a paper hexapuma at the moment. The Admiralty doesn't have the ships to make it anything but a shadow of what it was under Admiral White Haven. Your battle squadron, Alistair—all six ships worth of it—will constitute our entire 'wall of battle' for at least the immediate future."
"Excuse me?" McKeon blinked. "Our entire wall?"
"That's what I said," Honor replied grimly. "Not only that, but any additional wallers we receive for the next few months will almost certainly be old-style, pre-pod ships from the Reserve."


The IAN numbers are off because of construction delays, combined with extensive modifications to ships under construction. Basically, they provided very few SD(P)s prior to Lovat, apparently the 26 that got blown up with Home Fleet were about it.

"Your old friend Herzog von Rabenstrange contacted me a couple of weeks ago, just after you'd sortied for Sanskrit. Apparently the Emperor decided a month or two before that to express his displeasure at how long their refit programs seem to be dragging out. Apparently, he expressed it rather vigorously, and his navy decided they ought to take him seriously and reallocated their efforts. Basically, they pulled their yard dogs off of about a third of the total number of ships they'd been working on—the ones farthest from completion at this point—and concentrated the additional effort on the units which were already most advanced."
The First Space Lord shrugged.
"That decision has its downsides, of course. Among other things, it means the ships they were pulled off of are going to be even later in completing, and their concentration only covered about a quarter of their total SD(P) strength. Still, it means that somewhere between twenty-five and forty additional pod-layers, all refitted to handle the Keyhole II platforms and the flat-pack pods, are going to be coming forward over the next month and a half or so. Our intention at the moment is to assign all of them to Eighth Fleet. Which will just happen to finally make your command the biggest and most powerful we have. That's what we're planning to commit to Sanskrit II."
Honor sat back in her chair. The tardiness of the Andermani wallers' refits had led her to forget almost completely about them. But if they really were going to come forward in such numbers, double or triple the number of Apollo-capable ships under her command, then suddenly Jouett became a much more attractive target.
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by Theemile   » Wed May 27, 2020 9:28 am

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5241
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

According to the compendium, Grayson had completed 165 SD(p)s as of May 1st 1921, Manticore 110, And (not in the compendium) the Andermani had completed ~80 Adlers prior to BoMA. The Andermani still had ~40 under construction probably 4-6 months away from completion, Grayson had a deep pipeline with 2.5 SD(p)s completing each month, And finally, Manticore had it's Python Lump completing Late Fall/Early Winter 1921.

We had 13 known Alliance SD(p) losses pre-Boma. So construction as of July 1st 1921 should give us 110 + 80 + (165 + 5)= 360 - 13 losses = 347 active SD(p)s.

Now, If BoMA had not happened and losses been low, by Jan 1, 1921, Grayson should have fielded ~18 additional Wallers, Andermani 40, And Manticore ~200 (maybe), giving a fleet of roughly 600 SD(p)s.

but, we know that was not to be.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by Sigs   » Thu May 28, 2020 12:29 am

Sigs
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1485
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:09 pm

tlb wrote:That is exactly what is wrong with your analysis: yes it was planned as a contingency before Lovat; which means that they did not expect to need it, but wanted it ready. After Lovat, it stopped being a contingency and became a necessity because of the changed circumstance. You seem to be saying that military leaders should never have contingent emergency plans!

IT's one thing to have contingency plan A through Z, to actively plan to use the contingency if/when circumstances are right. Their plan was to go with Camille, and if that didn't accomplish their goals then go with Beatrice.

I don't know where the author is wrong, whether it's in the book or the post because they contradict each other. Personally the post is wrong because I am going to go by what is written in At All Cost, and there, the plan was to execute Camille with 6 Squadrons of SD(P)'s with CLAC's and escorts, at the same time they will deploy ships for Beatrice as well just in case Camille doesn't get them the results they needed.

To me this indicates that (1) they have sufficient forces to deploy a significant fleet of at least 240 SD(P)'s in a hidden location without it immediately becoming apparent that they have stripped 50% of their SD(P)'s right off the bat. (2) They fully intended to use it if Camille didn't work, they didn't just deploy 240+ SD(P)'s forward for an attack they had no intention of ever launching, their contingency was if "A" doesn't work we will go with "B", in this case "B" was Beatrice and my argument is that they had 900 SD(P)'s as Pritchart would never authorize the forward deployment of 50+% of the RHN's SD(P)'s especially on a contingency they never actually planned on using while awaiting the result of an operation that may take up to 6 months. (3) They forward deployed hundreds of SD(P)'s at a time when they have to be secure in their core systems, it means nothing if 8th Fleet crushes 1 or 2 core systems and Tourville crushes Alizon. They wont be negotiating from a position of strength, it will be a position of weakness, here you went into two important industrial systems, crushed their obsolete pickets and we retaliated by attacking the weakest member of your alliance and destroying the 10-15 SD(P)'s you have deployed there, what exactly does that show the Alliance? The whole point of Camille was to defeat an incursion into the republic(hence the ambush fleets and core system pickets), and then follow it up with an offensive of their own into Alliance space where they defeat an alliance taskforce and try to negotiate with the alliance after beating back their offensives and taking out a minor power.

If they wanted to launch Cammille according to their criteria they needed the Alliance to attack them and be driven back, now how exactly do you do that if 50% of your fleet is forward deployed on a contingency that wouldn't have been launched without Apollo which they didn’t know existed? I mean the RHN has limited ships and dozens or hundreds of systems to protect in a sphere of ~400 LY across. They have Haven, Bolthole, at least half a dozen important industrialized core systems, picket around Trevor's Star, picket the Front, then they deploy a fleet of 240 SD(P)'s for an operation they never intent on carrying out, they have deployed between 3-6 50 SD(P) fleets to cover "likely" targets, they have ~100 SD(P)'s working up and all they have is 620 SD(P)'s?

-Haven= No less than 100 SD(P)'s
-Bolthole= At least 50 SD(P)'s
-half a dozen core systems=180 SD(P)'s
-defences around Trevor's Star-100-150(call it 125) SD(P)'s
-main front=150-200(call it 175) SD(P)'s
-assume 4 "ambush" fleets= 200 SD(P)'s
-Tourville's 48 SD(P)'s

For a total of: 100+50+180+125+175+200+48= 878 SD(P)'s
To get the 240 SD(P)’s to forward deploy for the contingency they were never going to use they would have had to strip 1/3 of the core system defence, 1/5 of the Secondary Front picket(Trevor’s Star), 1/5 of the main front, ¼ of the “ambush” Fleets
They can’t strip Haven’s defences. The location of Bolthole might be unknown but they cant take that for granted, it’s a vital piece of their war effort so they have to protect that. There are core systems within the republic that they HAVE TO protect, those are systems that have major shipyards for SD(P)’s and escorts, LAC’s and CLAC’s or are industrialized enough to be vital to the economy of Republic. They have to picket the systems around Trevor’s Star or the MA might let loose 50-100 SD’s into those unprotected or under protected systems to wreak them. Same goes with the main front, cant leave it unprotected or all those systems Haven had to have back will be taken back by a handful of ships from 8th Fleet and support SD’s. As for the “ambush” fleets, there has to be at least 3 more likely 4 of them to make it worth while and might be more as was discussed in chapter 43 of At All Costs.

So for Beatrice, a contingency operation they were never going to execute they had to find 240 SD(P)’s to forward deploy. This means they had to take it from somewhere, this would be hard to do if there were 950 SD(P)’s, damn near impossible if only 620 SD(P)’s.
With 620 SD(P):
-Haven= 100 SD(P)'s
-Bolthole= 50 SD(P)'s
-half a dozen core systems=0 SD(P)'s
-defences around Trevor's Star-0 SD(P)'s
-main front=0 SD(P)'s
-assume 4 "ambush" fleets= 200 SD(P)'s
-Tourville's 48 SD(P)'s
-Beatrice 240 SD(P)’s

For a total of: 100+50+0+0+0+200+48+240= 638 SD(P)'s

Even with the new construction making it necessary for SD’s to be decommissioned for their crews, the alliance would have ~150 SD’s in their service, SD’s that are not frontline units but if the main front and the secondary(Trevor’s Star) front is stripped of defences they could be deployed on offensive operations the second they figure it out, wherever the republic attacks, those SD’s wont be adding much in the way of firepower against modern SD(P)’s they don’t add much firepower anywhere other than Talbott and apparently for offensive operations against 95% of the Republic. Send 50 SD’s to Talbott, take the other 120 SD’s backed up by 90 BC(P)’s and 60 CLAC’s with nothing but Katana’s and you have 3 offensive fleets against the RHN’s 300 SD’s that are picketing the 95% of the republic that is considered expendable.
Top
Re: How was Haven supposed to fight the SL (Detweiler Plan)?
Post by Sigs   » Thu May 28, 2020 12:56 am

Sigs
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1485
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:09 pm

kzt wrote:I'm not sure where the 420 SD(P)s comes from.

At AAC Haven had ~520, plus 100 not fully combat effective. This was up from 316 at the start of 1920.
Somebody upthread said that the author said there were no more than 80 SD(P)'s left over after the ships deployed for Beatrice.

At the start of 1920 the RMN had 75, minus the ~21 that got blown up, plus new construction. Most SD(P) are in Home Fleet and 3rd Fleet.
I think the 75 is what they had after all the losses were accounted for.

At the start of 1920 Grayson had 115. A large portion of that was anchored to Grayson
And High Ridge was complaining about the pace of Grayson's ship building, so that means that the GSN wasn't sitting still during peacetime, so they likely had a lot under construction. According a house of steel, the Grayson's built 104 Harrington-Class SD(P)'s and 61 Harrington II-Class ships, so at the start of hostilities the GSN likely had ~50 SD(P)'s under construction.

At the start of 1920 the Andies had 42, plus new construction.
RMN and IAN construction was delivering new ships right before Beatrice, but they were new ships that needed to be worked up/shaken down. And their yards were not delivering hundreds like Bolthole was.
At the start of the war the RMN had ~35 SD(P)'s under construction in the Manticore HS, all of which would be done well before May 1921, the IAN had ~90 SD(P)'s under construction with some being pushed to finish faster while letting other fall behind, so probably half of the IAN SD(P)'s finished late 1920 while the other were finishing around mid to late 1921.

The RMN started laying down ships as soon as war is restarted, the government is unified after the fall of High Ridge, hell even before the resumption of hostilities I would think even an incompetent prime minister would start laying down ships as soon as possible


According to At All Costs:
- 35 SD(P)'s from the RMN within 6-10 months of Jan 1920
- 90 SD(P)'s from the IAN within 18 months of Jan 1920 with majority being less than 12 months.
- They will have ~400 SD(P)'s between the RMN, IAN, and GSN within 11-18 months
- 160 BC(P)'s


RHN on the other hand:
- ~300 SD(P)'s in commission Jan 1920

- Estimated 400-450 under construction in Bolthole assumed to have started immediately after completing the previous ~300 SD(P)'s so that would be late 1918 early 1919 with expected completion in early 1921.

- 400 SD(P)'s under construction in Nouveau Paris and 2-3 other major yards(Construction really started July/august 1919) with expected

So the expectation was that the RHN would have 1,100 SD(P)'s by 3rd quarter of 1921 till beginning of 1922 for the last batch. So by mid 1921 the Alliance would have had ~400 SD(P)'s with the RHN having 85% of the expected 1,100 in commission at that point.
Top

Return to Honorverse