

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
I wonder if it would be practical to couple freighters together, like triple-trailored semis. That way, you'd only pay for one transit. It should be cheaper.
Someone is always trying to buck the system. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Galactic Sapper
Posts: 524
|
What's missing here is that the compensated level of acceleration changes in a grav wave. Your grav plate ships would be accelerating at 50g at max even in a wave, while the conventional ships competing with it would be rocketing away at 5000+g. |
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4664
|
Can you control the grav wave acceleration in the first place? That is, can you give it a smaller sail or tack the wave or something? How do compensators compensate 5000 gravities? Or maybe this is like aeroplanes' air speed: ground speed is irrelevant, only the speed against the surrounding air is relevant. So the acceleration is measured against something not in the wave, but locally nothing changes. That way, both compensator and grav-plate ships can accelerate equally when entering a grav wave. |
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
tlb
Posts: 4776
|
You had better be able to change the value of acceleration, because you are still limited to a max velocity of .6c based on particle and radiation shielding. So the amount of acceleration is wonderful with a compensator, but a grav-plate ship can still use the energy gained from the grav wave and plod along. |
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Jonathan_S
Posts: 9053
|
No - not coupled together. That'd make the geometry all wrong. Now if Astro Control will allow it you could do a simultaneous transit. It's riskier than a solo transit, and takes some more preparation, but it's not that risky. Mind you they'd probably still charge you per ship so it wouldn't help. Also it doesn't help with transit times. Even if we take a pair of small 4.5 mton ships (around the size of the JNMTC fast freighters Honor was escorting during 'In Enemy Hands') their minimum transit time normally would be 120 seconds (they'd each lock it down for 32.5 seconds, but the Junction has a 60 second separation as a minimum permitted interval). If they instead did a simultaneous transit their combined 9 mtons would lock the route down for 129.6 seconds. (And of course most freighters are larger than that, which makes the time impact even worse) Last edited by Jonathan_S on Wed May 20, 2020 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
George J. Smith
Posts: 873
|
I would think the 60 second gap between transits would normally include the lockdown period, at least for ships of a size which would not result in a longer lockdown period. .
T&R GJS A man should live forever, or die in the attempt Spider Robinson Callahan's Crosstime Saloon (1977) A voice is heard in Ramah |
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Jonathan_S
Posts: 9053
|
D'oh! ![]() Off to fix my post... |
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Galactic Sapper
Posts: 524
|
In The Universe Of Honor Harrington (in the More Than Honor anthology) compensators are described as being far more effective at dumping inertial forces into grav waves than they are into impeller wedges (which are described as "tamed grav waves") and gives a table of typical acceleration rates for various tonnages of ships both civilian and navy. The acceleration rates of ships in a grav wave is between nine and ten times as high as under impeller wedge. Clearly that's just an approximation as it's contradicted slightly in OBS.
|
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Geometry all wrong? Like an ugly monstrosity trying to prevent wedge fratricide? It would only be for a short time. Linked up just prior to transiting. But. If it COULD be accomplished, Manticore would have to allow it if it could be effected in the same time-frame as one transit. And it should be cheaper, saving the cost of a transit. It should also help the MBS move more traffic as well. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Did the MBS corner the market on trade? | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Theemile
Posts: 5368
|
the disturbance is mass based, not per ship based. as Jonathan said, simultaneous jumps are already a thing, but are difficult to pull off and disrupt the junction for an abnormal time - the same time a single ship massing the same as the multiple ship simultaneous jump would. So there is no savings on time or money to do something wonky. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |