Sigs wrote:ThinksMarkedly wrote:
Why would the SLN be operating under the authority of the GA in the first place?
Uhm… so what let them continue operating under Frontier Security? If the idea is to use FF to patrol the verge and protectorates I would hope at the very least someone from the GA is around to keep them honest. Letting them to continue business as usual without oversight seems like a terrible idea.
Honor told them to stay inside their borders otherwise they'd be hunted as pirates, so yes, if they are out in the Verge hunting pirates, they should only do so under GA supervision. Which means that a GF ship should be around to keep them honest.
SLN ship with nearby GF ship? Good.
SLN ship alone? Bad.
Easy to teach everyone. And if the GA presses it, that should also curtail the sale of ships to rogues and other planets: "any ship of SL manufacture we find in the Verge are pirates and are your fault".
I would be very vocal in distinguishing the two, yes it will redeem the navy's image in the future but it would be a very obvious division[cut]
Ok, so that's a PR problem of the entity as a whole, not an issue to individual people. If 99%% of the new entity is composed of people from the old entity, so long as they operate under good, honest rules, that should be fine.
They may also want to rename the entity, instead of "Navy". Call it the Argosy. Or High Guard. Or the Star Fleet.
She was wrong, but if she did not see it that way its even worse because the SLN handed 100 SD's and 65 escorts to an idiot who didn't grasp the right and privileges that the constitution grants League citizens and League member systems and was willing to murder 150,000+ BSDF members, League citizens due to ignorance, stupidity and laziness.
She was wrong indeed, but so were her immediate superiors, the SLN leadership and the SL leadership who ordered her around. And to be honest, I think you'll find it very difficult to identify officers who grasp the finer details of constitutional law. It's not their job to interpret the Constitution. And besides, there were plenty of lawyers and academics in the employ of the government who had interpreted the Constitution for them and gave the orders a legal basis. Why should she question that?
She, like the spacers under her, were at the pointy end of the stick.
That is not to say that "just following orders" is a justifiable excuse. But it's been used, often enough. That doesn't make her an idiot.
I can't speculate why they'd have SDs if they can't form a wall.
Prestige?
Very expensive way demonstrate it, but then again, isn't that the usual nature of prestige? So yeah, totally believable as a reason.
At the time of the Falklands War, the Argentinean Navy had a carrier (the General Belgrano), one of only two in the Southern Hemisphere. But it didn't leave port because they were afraid that RN subs would sink it. I can imagine all sorts of Shell systems with a hundred-year-old SD or DN that they keep but won't risk in a real fight.