Joat42 wrote:cthia wrote:Redundancy in compensator design isn't practical because it would still be subject to the technology. Technology operates on a time factor. Any time it would take for the auxillary system to kick in would be way too much.
If it was possible I guess we would have seen ships with redundant compensators.
But as you say, if it's feasible to have 2 compensators on a ship - if there is even a slight delay in the backup kicking in everything will be subject to 100's of gees for a very short period. I do wonder how meatbags would react to those forces, even for a couple of microseconds.
But it's entirely possible that the physics behind compensators doesn't allow for redundancy.
Indeed, and thinking about it, it probably isn't feasible to have both compensators operating simultaneously for the same reason imposed by the reaction time of the components given above.* If you have both compensators operating at once, you'd somehow have to "sync" both compensators. A slight misalignment (npi) and you're dead meat. Think being the object of a severe tug of war between two angry King Kongs. You could die just as violently without a failure, simply with a sync problem. That design would probably be more dangerous than a single compensator.
*A design I once considered.
.