Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 56 guests
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by TFLYTSNBN » Tue Feb 11, 2020 11:45 am | |
TFLYTSNBN
|
I am not so certain that Emily would have preferred that things remain the same.
She was criplled and confined to a wheelchair. All of my jesting about Emily's mouth still being functional aside, there probably were medical reasons why not even that was possible. This would explain her tolerance for professional coutessans. More importantly, Emilly could not have children. Having an heir is a HUGE issue in an aristocratic society. Weber makes it clear that Emily has strong maternal instincts. Emily had almost certainly participated in formal diplomatic functions involving Grayson. She had probably met Protector Benjamin, and his wives. Polygamy just like monogamy can enable abuse, but Weber portrays Protector Benjamin's marriage very positively. Benjamin loves his wives and his wives love him. His wives love each other and they love their sister wives children as well as their own. I can easily believe that observing polygamist marriage among Graysons might have inspired Emily to consider polygamy as a possible solution to her own dilemma even before the scandal erupted. She gets to preserve her own marriage complete with the financial, social and political benefits. It seems that she continues to benefit emotionally from her husband. She also benefits emotionally from Honor. She gets to be a co mother to Honor's children. When she has children of her own, Honor is the co mother. Honor is also a profoundly powerful protector for her children, with or without 8th Fleet behind her. |
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by cthia » Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:09 pm | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
I certainly agree, ultimately. After the fact. After she met Honor and had a chance to get to know her. After she met Allison, and learned of the opportunity to leave an heir. All after the fact that Hamish found additional love elsewhere. Before she had a chance to learn about and enjoy all of the positives compromise would bring, if given a choice beforehand, she would have passed on it. IMO. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by tlb » Tue Feb 11, 2020 2:33 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4441
|
I never thought you were attacking either Honor or Hamish; instead I thought you were identifying yourself too closely with Emily to see that her choices need not be yours. Emily had 40 years to come to grips with her physical condition. Life can limit the range of choices a person has and that was definitely true for her after the crash. But a person could choose resentment and depression; fortunately Emily had the strength to reject depression and rise above resentment even when Hamish sought physical release elsewhere. The text makes clear that a spark of resentment could still flicker, but Emily realized that it was just the result of the accident and something she would refuse to blame on Hamish. Then came the manufactured scandal and Emily's political calculations. Clearly I should have included some more text; because reading that chapter you will see that part of the strategy was that it would fatal if Honor and Hamish became lovers, to which they both agreed. It was only after the scandal had gone away and after she spent time with the treecat, Samantha, that she realized how much they were hurting by attempting to avoid hurting her. It was much later that Honor's accidental pregnancy (because her contraceptive implant lapsed) caused a new crisis and the religious leaders suggested that Hamish and Emily revise their vows to allow an additional spouse. You are correct that the range of human nature allows for those that would reject supporting Hamish's dalliances, but it also allows for those that would accept limitations imposed by life's whims and not blame Hamish (or later Honor) for straying. |
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by Peregrinator » Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:16 pm | |
Peregrinator
Posts: 179
|
deleted
Last edited by Peregrinator on Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by Peregrinator » Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:22 pm | |
Peregrinator
Posts: 179
|
Assuming that Hamish and Honor's "marriage" is considered (a) valid and (b) not morganatic under Manticoran law and custom where the inheritance of titles is concerned. |
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by tlb » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:12 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4441
|
The text certainly treats the marriage as valid and we have no idea what the actual state of Manticoran law is with regard to inheritance, not even whether titles can be conveyed by a will. From At All Costs:
|
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by tlb » Wed Feb 12, 2020 2:25 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4441
|
According to Merriam-Webster, morganatic is defined as "of, relating to, or being a marriage between a member of a royal or noble family and a person of inferior rank in which the rank of the inferior partner remains unchanged and the children of the marriage do not succeed to the titles, fiefs, or entailed property of the parent of higher rank". Since Honor has a higher rank in both Manticore and Grayson societies, I am not sure that the word applies; unless you are worried that Hamish's rank is too inferior. |
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by Peregrinator » Wed Feb 12, 2020 5:10 pm | |
Peregrinator
Posts: 179
|
I wasn't quite sure of the precise word to use, I chose "morganatic" because it seemed the best for when the children of the marriage are excluded from succession. I doubt rank matters much under Manticoran law; but a polygynous union might. |
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by tlb » Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:15 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4441
|
I simply do not understand how you can question the legality of a polygamous marriage under Manticoran law. The churchmen do not question it, Michelle Henke does not question it; the only legal question that Honor and her lawyer are worried about is whether Hamish is considered to be in the chain of command, which would bar Honor from serving in her Manticoran rank. Please find somewhere in the books where anyone considers Honor's marriage to Hamish and Emily to be less than legal. |
Top |
Re: Honor/Hamish/Emily | |
---|---|
by Galactic Sapper » Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:26 pm | |
Galactic Sapper
Posts: 524
|
There is no question that the marriage itself is legal; there is concern expressed as to if/how it affects passing of titles. Apparently it's a situation that has rarely or never arose in the Manticoran nobility. Since Manticore practices primogeniture (oldest offspring inherits), does it apply to marriages as well? Does the earlier marriage of Hamish and Emily mean their offspring are "senior" in terms of inheriting White Haven, or is it the oldest offspring of the marriage regardless of maternity? Obviously for the Harrington titles, since their being passed down through Honor and not Hamish, her direct offspring are "senior". In terms of the Steadholdership, it's suggested that Emily's genetic children are not in the succession at all and after Raoul it would pass back to Faith as an "heir of her body" meaning bloodline rather than marriage. |
Top |