Fox2! wrote:Even though Unconquered is minimally functional, that still means she needs reactor, power generation and distribution, some minimal damage control, communication, life support, services (mess, supply, medical and dental, Masters at Arms, personnel, etc.). So, 250 to 500 crew, including an Exec who is actually command qualified. A lot of these may be people who are on pre-retirement assignment, restricted duty, or first term. Probably not a lot of mid rank petty officers and commissioned officers.
Why would she need a functional, powered up reactor? Why can't she be on "ground" power, an umbilical connected to the main station where she's moored to. I imagine most ships not in active service are on ground power anyway, Unconquered would be no different. Ditto for mess services: why would you want to eat aboard the ship, instead of on station?
I agree some technicians are needed to make sure power distribution and life support are working through the sections where people should be present, but that's a self-reinforcing proposal: you need people to make it possible for people to be there. The fewer people you want to keep, the fewer people you need. And the only people you really need are the maintenance technicians that must be going through the ship every now and then.
I also don't think those are your general technicians. We're talking about maintaining a 350-year-old ship, with commensurate technology. As much as RFC told us that innovation had stagnated for centuries, it hasn't in the past 20, so whatever they're teaching right now at the technical schools won't work on Unconquered. You actually need specialised people.
In conclusion, whoever was aboard Unconquered wouldn't be sufficient to fly her, much less put her in a dangerous situation of intercepting debris in chaotic trajectories. Any qualified personnel who could have done that could just as easily get to another ship nearby.