ThinksMarkedly wrote:Galactic Sapper wrote:The function the Rolands were designed to fulfill isn't really there any more, and a more balanced (and even larger) design will likely be created. I seem to remember something about a "notional 300k combatant" that RFC was discussing as the minimum ship necessary to carry out all the peacetime patrol functions the RMN will need.
Reworking the flag facilities may well be a reasonable stop-gap measure, but the Rolands may have other shortcomings that would limit their antipiracy capabilities in other ways (small craft hanger capacity, for instance, or limited/no brig space).
A Flight II Roland could have those redesigned, possibly at the expense of smaller missile loads.
On the 300k ton combatant: would that be a CL or a DD? We know the RMN does not assign ship types on mass, but on purpose. So what are the criteria for a DD and for a CL?Or further construction of Avalons to replace older destroyers with more capable CLs which still require smaller crews.
Thus the notional 300k displacement combatant. That was what RFC and the BuNine people had worked out to fit all the Marine, small craft, greater DDM storage, etc. etc. etc. that the RMN would want in a spammable peacetime patrol design. It's a measure of how much missile combat has changed that the same functions which used to be served by a destroyer now require a ship the size of a Star Knight class heavy cruiser.
Such a ship would likely be designated a light cruiser, since its primary function would be convoy escort and peacekeeping duties. Destroyers seem to be more offensive than defensive: raiders, scouts, convoy killers rather than protectors.