kzt wrote:TFLYTSNBN wrote: Barricade does not seem so implausible to me. Any missile is far more vulnerable during the ballistic phase. (This is why there is so much panic over "hypersonic vehicles" for ICBMs which are nothing more than an RV with guidance and extremely limited maneuverability. The ability to evade intercept goes to crap as the desired accuracy decreases.)
The geometry just doesn't work unless you assume the missiles are lined up head to tail. This means the missiles have no target and can't be controlled. As it was stated they had not done any manipulation, and a missile will automatically position such that it can both see the target and see the launching ship this seems 'unlikely'.
They are going to arrange themselves in a basically 2D grid, probably at least 20km from each other, with the nose at the target and the tail at the launcher. And there just isn't any way for the stated geometry to work. The source missile pods would have to have been at right angles to the launcher-target line to have any chance to get more than one missile.
Are you saying that all of the 500 missiles launched in each flight were on a plane? I don't think so. Since there were 8 battlecruisers towing the missile pods, I suspect that there were 8 planes of missiles in each wave. That would give each Barricade missile, in theory, a chance to take out 8 missiles from each wave. In theory only, because the dispersal patterns appeared to all the missiles lined up quite that neatly.
TFLYTSNBN wrote: Not to mention that he had a pair of LACs each towing the entire pod core of a SD(P) at 700G in full stealth....
Not quite 700G (because I don't think the cruisers got that high), definitely over 500G.