Silverwall wrote:BTW for those wondering why I am so dismissive of level bombing as a viable tactic against point targets I give you exhibit A:
The Bieldfeld viaducts: "The viaducts connected Berlin to the Ruhr over the river Werre, had a width of 27 feet at track level, each carried two tracks, the viaducts was constructed with 26 arches each with a span of 46 feet and a height of around 73 feet, the overall length of them was around a 1100 feet each."
by 1945 the RAF had expended over 3000 tons of bombs trying to hit this target and had achieved no more than scratch damage easily repaired. At this point they dedicated 617 squadron (the elite dambusters squadron ) using the 22000 lb grand slam bomb to the job. after several attempts called off by bad weather (AKA clouds) they finally killed it using the earthquake bombs.
http://www.dambusters.org.uk/after-the- ... bielefeld/
agreed
UK wasted well over £600 billion in today's money, huge numbers of pilots, effort etc on the huge heavy bomber fleet and it achieved VERY little for it's costs
and, murder huge numbers of German civilians and left Germany in a bad state and that wasn't goof after the war ended
if only they'd spent the money more wisely, escort ships, carriers, dive bombers, ground attack aircraft, decent tanks etc
sigh
several folk in this thread are right I think
in WW2, *only* low level bombing was accurate such as dive bombing or toss bombing, with a few exceptions (guided weapons or very elite groups like 617 squadron)
America wasted almost as much on the damn useless Norden bomb sight as on the Manhattan Project!
Area bombing sucked but yes,
strategically it could have a big effect, see Doolittle's Raid on Tokyo for example
Airships are way way better level bombers than aeroplanes
however they are extremely vulnerable to suitable antiaircraft fire and oddly enough, mass rocket fire IS one of the things that'd be vulnerable to
but, it takes time and effort to set such up and are themselves incredibly vulnerable to bombing or artillery (or sabotage)
and God help any poor soul who's underneath a rocket AA barrage!!
however, no one outside Charis has smokeless powder or good optics so most antiaircraft guns will suck
it will take time to develop doctrine for dealing with bombers of any kind so first uses will be hard to stop and so most effective, probably
German leadership/systems absolutely sucked, it was NOT "efficient", yeesh and the Japanese were vastly worse than that!
wasn't really until Speer got involved that things got better but by that point losses and increasingly bad leadership were spiralling problems Germany couldn't overcome
"gardening" (mine laying) and low level bombing by Mosquitoes (which could be accurate) did a lot of havoc to critical factories and their materiel in Germany
quite a few submarine diesels presumably ended up on the bottom of German rivers and canals
as per Germany WW2:
the use of slave labour as in concentration camp or coercion you can imagine happening in Safehold with the way things are going after TFT
I'd bet Zhyou-Zhwo wouldn't think twice about forcing South Harchong folk into production eventually, and Siddimark may do so with Temple Loyalists and Charisians etc as slaves