Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by kzt » Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:21 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
Be ause that implies it was told to at least dozens of RMN officers, wjo also have need to know.
The fact that something is interesting and cool is not a sifficent reason to tell everyone who might want to know. Why do they need to know? If you cant answer that they don't need to know. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by ThinksMarkedly » Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:27 pm | |
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4515
|
But that's exactly the point: many of them had a need to know. Elizabeth and Honor and probably all of the Lords of the Admiralty had a need: to be convinced of Haven's trustworthiness. A lot of other people had other needs: for example, to figure out the logistics of getting personnel and material shipped there, and hardware shipped back. And the crews of the military ships going there. And even if you don't tell the exact galactic coordinates, knowing it's an A-K8 binary system within 10 light-years of Calvin narrows down the possibilities to exactly 1. Others, who don't have a need to know, probably weren't told. Like Mercedes Brigham. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by kzt » Sun Oct 06, 2019 10:12 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
If you are involved in logistics planning at that level then you have a need to know. Otherwise all you need to know “They told us, and confirmed it. Now stop asking questions about things you are not read into before I have to get someone here to ask you some questions.”
Being the senior aviation officer in the US Navy doesn’t mean you get told about the crush depth of Ohio class subs. And if you were to ask those kind of questions I suspect people would be concerned. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by tlb » Sun Oct 06, 2019 10:29 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4441
|
If standing with Manticore against Filereta's fleet isn't proof of trustworthiness, then what is? I will accept that Honor is probably not a risk, but you are going too far. It would be better if she and the Queen and all of the Lords of the Admiralty did not know and the logistics train has already been set up; so there is no need for more. Even most of the crews that make the trip should not know and the number of such crews should be limited. KZT's basic point is correct, as knowledge of a secret expands the probability of the secret being exposed expands faster. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by ThinksMarkedly » Sun Oct 06, 2019 10:37 pm | |
ThinksMarkedly
Posts: 4515
|
Actually, that's a good point. And one person who did not need to be convinced of the trustworthiness was Honor: she could tell Pritchart and Theisman were being honest. Another aspect is that divulging the secret to Manticore removes the possibility of a later Havenite government changing its mind. But they can still accomplish that without the Lords knowing the details: they can always order one of their subordinates to tell them, but what they don't know they can't divulge. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by Theemile » Mon Oct 07, 2019 9:27 am | |
Theemile
Posts: 5241
|
The top 25 comment (top 4% of Honorverse navies) is for a navy to own more than 1 squadron of Capital ships (BBs, DNs, and SDs) in 1900. Probably another 25-50 navies had a handful of Wallers down to a single ancient BB (AKA, a white elephant), and another 50-100 topped out with BCs (Like Mesa), And most of these are most likly SDFs. HoS only mentions the sale of SDs to Erewhon (1 squadron of King Williams and "some" Andurils) and Grayson (the 34 remaining Victories, 17 of the 18 Captured Duquesnes, and all 3 captured Havens). While this leaves ~27 SDs unaccounted for, these are mostly smaller, pre-laserhead designs who endured the entire 1st war. These ships were most likely lost along the way, along with the 14 loses in the Samothrace, Victory, Sphinx, and Gryphon classes). I don't have firm 1st war losses, but 41 SDs over 8 years seems... reasonable, especially when the losses seem accumulated in the older, smaller classes. While anyone could have bought SDs from Manticore (especially at the offered cost), we don't have any textev that anyone else did. However, there was a 4th Alliance member who operated and built their own SDs - Talbot, the star to the north between-ish Seaford 9 and Haven had their own SD yard - and the Cromarty govt and the High Ridge Govt both refused to give advanced build tech to. how many ships they owned and built is unknown, but given that they didn't have Manty tech, they were not building ships for the RMN, so were building another design for themselves. They were mentioned alongside Grendlesbane in text for building alliance SDs. We know the following have or will have capital ships SLN RHN RMN IAN ESN GSN BSDF TSN (Talbot) ASN (Asgerd - probably) MSN (Mannerheim - 1 DN seen) MAN (own BB sized Shark Podlayers) MSN (Mesa - on the way) ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by Sigs » Mon Oct 07, 2019 7:54 pm | |
Sigs
Posts: 1485
|
My point is that if somehow someone leaked that Bolthole is actually the colony from the colony ship everyone KNOWS disappeared and someone used the honorverse equivalent of Google to figure out where it was going to begin with it narrows things down. If it is accessible to everyone who is interested to know about the expedition then if someone spills the beans that Bolthole is actually expedition x, that's all they need since whoever starts looking will look at the target system first and fan out from there, its not that complicated once you have a starting point and a much more narrow area than 100,000 or more systems. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by Sigs » Mon Oct 07, 2019 8:32 pm | |
Sigs
Posts: 1485
|
Canada is bigger than the US but I think we wont fare too well fighting the US militarily and the US economy is probably 10 times that of Canada. The GA having 500 systems and then another 1,000 verge systems that are building up their industries doesent even come close to 500 heavily industrialized and wealthy systems with 5 billion + population per system. The Ga might have at most 50 systems that are moderately industrialized and hal that which might compare to a core/shell worlds industry and at the moment Grayson, Manticore and Beowulf are not amongst them. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by Sigs » Mon Oct 07, 2019 8:45 pm | |
Sigs
Posts: 1485
|
The why has a very specific and direct correlation to the how. The level of force I would commit to an operation directly correlates to what I would want to accomplish. If I wanted to accomplish everything OB accomplished I would send the smallest force I could. Sending double or triple the number of ships wouldn't have done much for Weyland. Sending double of triple the number of ships in to a system like Manticore with the RMN's Home Fleet, numerous forts and significant sensor coverage would not be worth the risk. I am not suggesting pulverizing the League into independent systems, the SLN is a serious motivation to leave and go on their own for a hell of a lot of systems unless something major happens to change their outlook. And will have a fleet of Bolthole build SD(P)'s a by the end of 1923. |
Top |
Re: Would Dispersing Shipyards Blunt or Stop a Second Oyster | |
---|---|
by tlb » Mon Oct 07, 2019 8:47 pm | |
tlb
Posts: 4441
|
I agree, that is what I meant when I said the following: A problem is that the lost colony story is too good and might invite the telling in a place where it can be overheard. Not that I think that Honor knowing the secret is a problem; but telling would reveal the location, even without knowing about the wormhole. |
Top |