Dilandu wrote:Bluesqueak wrote:So we're talking a devout dedication to the truth of witnesses.
Which is basically what all religious fanatics based on: the devoid dedication to the "truth" as they think it is. In case of SSK, it's just the case of mindless devotion ACCIDENTALLY being based on actual truth)
Let's not forget, SSK did not knew all the details of what happens. Their all ideology was basically based on
"something isn't right on Safehold, albeit we could not comprehend what exactly". While the Brotherhood of Saint Zherneau at least knew the actual truth in more or less coherent form & have really persuasive evidences in therms of Saint Zherneau's direct letter and books predating the Creation, SSK worked from far less sustainable basis.
This sounds rather like either you don't understand what mindless devotion is, or you don't understand what religious devotion is.
The Sisterhood of St Kohdy didn't
accidentally hit on the truth. They were founded by people who knew Kohdy. The people who knew Kohdy were warned in advance that the Testimonies were going to be purged, and took steps. There's no accident about this, and there's no accident about the evidence provided to the young Sisters.
They know that the Church lies. The CoGA says Kohdy never existed - Nynian has read his diary and seen how Helm Cleaver can cut steel. She's seen his tomb. She isn't basing this on mindless devotion. Her theory is based on what she's seen, touched and read. Kohdy existed, and the church lied. There's no lack of comprehension about that part. They're not asking their young recruits to mindlessly accept stuff - they're showing them the evidence they've got.
Now, they are struggling with the idea that the Adams and Eves were somewhere else before Safehold, because Kohdy didn't understand what was going on himself. However, rather than having mindlessly picked one theory and sticking to it through thick and thin, they're arguing about it based on Kohdy's testimony.
There's a certain lack of mindlessness about the Sisterhood, and a substantial amount of hard-headed practicality.
Dilandu wrote:Bluesqueak wrote:So we're talking a devout dedication to the truth of witnesses. Kohdy may be the biggest mistake the COGA made, because it meant that the truth some people saw with their own eyes was now in conflict with the 'truth' of 'authority'. Previously, eyewitnesses and Writ agreed.
Yes, this was strangely monumental blunder. The Archangel's actions around Kohdy seems... incoherent. Why exactly they returned the body? The "mystical disappearance" of Kohdy would be MUCH simpler to explain ("he was taken to the throne of Langhorn itself, of course!") than the existence of dead body. And Rakurai strike against the initial abbey was also... not exactly the best solution.
Yes, that's the question, isn't it? Who decided that Kohdy had to be written out of history? Who decided that his order had to be wiped out, because they were bound to recognise that the Testimonies had been edited? Who seems to have treated the entire Sisterhood of St Kohdy as so dangerous that they had to be blotted out of existence?
Which rather gets back to PeterZ's question. Why were the Sisterhood
so devoted and what was it that made Kohdy so dangerous that the Church couldn't even afford to have him remembered as a real person?