tlb wrote:cthia wrote:My views are also derived from the knowledge of how a business works. Long ago I wondered where Leonard got the small fortune that was surely needed to kick things off, and support it until dividends elsewhere began to pay off. I know the slaves and a lot of what was going on behind the scenes at Mesa, went a long way towards funding his delusions of grandeur. But I assume he sought help from outside parties. Financially viable outside parties, who became shareholders. Shareholders implies a Board of Directors who looks out for their investment, by looking out for the company. Yatta yatta yatta. Board of Directors are not normally founders, for obvious reasons not only surrounding a conflict of interest. Perhaps I got it completely switched at birth about the roles of the LRPB and the General Strategy Board. And perhaps the General Strategy Board is the Board of Directors. Though "General" throws me off. And as I said, "Long Range Planning" is exactly the definition of a Board of Directors.Torch of Freedom, chapter 5 wrote:The Board was responsible not simply for overseeing the careful, continually ongoing development of the genomes under its care, but also for providing the Alignment with the tactical abilities its strategies and operations required.
We have agreed that the LRPB is not a board of directors for the Mesan Alignment, but what if it was the board of directors for Manpower Incorporated? Then a board of geneticists would make sense and Jack's statement quoted above is not about micromanagement, but is instead the hidden agenda that was concealed by slave development. We know that Manpower used its genetic experimentation to develop the "star" lines of Alpha, Beta and Gamma; in addition to the specialty slave lines. Presumably the LRPB, as transplanted to Darius, will continue the experimentation; but solely to improve the existing lines.
Well, I've only agreed that I don't know one way or the other, and as I've said, I wouldn't be surprised if we're both way off base. But I do like your take on things. Considering the possibility the LRPB could be the BoD of Manpower is not only brilliant, but insightful and impressive thinking. It creates more questions, though, as well as cautions and speedbumps.
First off, it still leaves the question of who the BoD of the Alignment is. One board can certainly manage both, but that would lead us right back where we started. The caution is the fact that having a BoD for Manpower who is so far inside the Onion is risky. BoDs are very visible and hands on entities who are visible to the company and to the community, in fact, they interact quite closely with the community. I seem to recall a passage that states the Alignment was very careful about being too visible on Mesa, and within Manpower -- an act of maintaining anonymity, in case the Lord is unwilling and the creek rises, as it did when Tenth Fleet and the union of Cachat and Zilwicki bore fruit. It is possible that a member of the Alignment's BoD is the CEO of Manpower. Or that the CEO of Manpower reported directly to a handler within the LRPB or the LRPB itself, as CEOs typically report to the BoD. CEOs are usually a member of the board, and more often than not he is the chairman of the board—Leonard, then later Albrecht? Most public companies require half of all board members to be unrelated to the company. (That conflict of interest thing again.) Of course, there's no reason the Alignment has to be a public company on Darius, or that business models work the same on Darius.
It must be noted, there has always been ethical reservations against CEOs being voting Board Members. It seems this would be an even more important reservation within the Alignment.
And if all of that isn't complicated enough, it gets worse if there is an actual President and a CEO.
Where does this leave us? I have absolutely no idea, other than the opinion that the BoD of Manpower and of the Alignment are not the same. But without the author's input, your guess is as good as, or even better than, my own. I have more of a chance of being tripped up by current business models, and someone who may be unaffected by such baggage may have a better shot at it.
At any rate, I think there's a good chance that somewhere there is a shell company. Manpower was somewhat of a shell company, but not truly in the traditional and strategic sense. But then, the MA is anything but a traditional entity. ::shrug::