dobriennm wrote:DMcCunney wrote:If my assumption that it was an appearance by Schueler and not a sneaky IC trick is correct, the IC will be just as gobsmacked as everyone else.
Here we will agree to disagree.
Disagree all you like. But before you continue, answer the question I posed earlier.
Schueler apparently appeared in his cathedral on the day of the Feast of the Holy Schueler, and told the faithful gathered there that Shan Wei did not Fall and that Chihiro lied.
He left behind a holy book that is the Testimony of Schueler. Just what does that document
say? That volume pretty much has to contain his
proof of the assertions he made.
If it's all a sneaky IC trick, tell me what proof they
can provide that
can't be summarily ignored or dismissed as a vile plot by Shan Wei? (If they can't provide that proof, there's no point in making the assertions.)
Seijin Kohdy's diary records that he was defeated in combat by one of the Fallen, who did not kill him, but sat him down and presented evidence Kohdy could not dismiss that
Chihiro had turned to evil and was modifying Langhorne's plan. Kohdy does not record what the evidence was - only that it shook him enough to go to Zion to ask Schueler about it, and he died in Zion. We
don't know whether he actually spoke to Schueler before he was killed, and I think whether he did is significant.
What the IC needs to put into the Testimony to prove Schueler's assertions to the faithful is the sort of evidence the Fallen presented to Kohdy, but they don't
have it. Anything in the Testimony documenting the truth of Schueler's assertions must be backed by
verifiable evidence that
cannot simply be dismissed by those who read it. (And will need to accord with records from the period between the destruction of Langhorne's HQ and the end of the War Against the Fallen that may be stored in the Temple that the IC has no knowledge of.)
You're the IC. You really wrote the Testimony of Schueler. What actual
proof can you provide for your assertions that
must be taken seriously by the Vicarate?
Given what the IC actually
knows (and that's largely from sources they can't reveal anyway)
I can't think of any.
Tell me what
your proof is?
With the chapter just before the appearance of Schuler having Cayleb authorize Operation Androcles (Schuler's first name), followed immediately by the appearance in the next chapter, there is little doubt in my mind that this is "the second stage of the nefarious Nahrmahn Plan" (direct quote from TFT).
I think this conflates two events that are actually separate and not directly connected. The placement of them adjacent to each other in the text encourages that, which I think is RFC being sneaky. They might be related, but do not
have to be, and the assumption they
are related is a major point of controversy.
My understanding of the Nahrmann Plan is an intensification of something the IC has been doing all along - encourage the industrialization of Safehold for all they're worth, and develop Safehold as much as they can
without obviously violating the Proscriptions.
That process will inevitably nibble away at the Proscriptions, but that's been happening for centuries, because the rulings of the Intendents assigned to rule on such things were increasingly matters of how big a bribe was offered.
It is also intended to spread it so widely that any returning Archangel who
isn't totally crazy will have no choice but to accept it. That genie can't be stuffed back into the bottle without effectively dooming mankind on Safehold, given the level of destruction needed to erase it.
And it positions Safehold to advance far more quickly once the Proscriptions do go away, because it will already have almost everything save electric power.
I don't know what Operation Androcles might be, but I don't believe the appearance of Schueler in his cathedral on the anniversary of his mortal body's death is part of it.
I do think the timing on Operation Androcles comes from September 915 coming and going
without an obvious Archangel return. That was the first date on which it might occur, and put pressure on the IC to do as much as possible before it took place to leave Safehold in a state returning Archangels
couldn't roll back.
With that date passed, they have more time to play with to push things along, and Operation Androcles is part of that.
DMcCunney wrote:I expect much consternation to ensue.

Which ever one of us is right, much consternation
will ensue.
As will much bloodshed, unfortunately as Desnair and South Harchong reject the revelations and start a new Holy War. Cynically on the part of the rulers as they will use their populace's religious fervor to motivate much shedding of their people's blood to maintain their position and power.
Desnair and South Harchong can start a new Holy War if they like, but what can they actually
do? Just who would they be fighting?
Desnair has no navy, and no way of projecting power beyond its borders to anyplace it does not directly connect to. Zhyou Zhwo in South Harchong is in a similar position, and increasingly hemmed in. What havoc can they cause beyond their own borders?
Looking at the maps, Desnair could attempt to annex Delferak, but it's not clear why they would bother. They might attempt to attack Silkiah, but that would get them a response by both Charis and Dohlor I don't see them wanting to provoke yet. They might also attack Sodar, but again, why bother?
South Harchong is in what might charitably be described as a state of flux. Zhyou Zhwo might consider himself at war with Charis but has no realistic way of conducting active operations, and won't for some time. He's still trying to assert his control of South Harchong, and bring to heel competing warlords who will profess loyalty to him as Emperor only so long as they have something to gain by it (and will happily try to depose him and crown themselves emperor if any of them thinks they can pull it off.)
Holy War as a way to strengthen their control over their own population is a questionable tactic. It didn't work out well for them the last time, and the folks who are the ones they will want to assert control over will be the ones who suffered before. Expecting them to fight and die again in a cause like that might be exactly what will make them lose control of the people they are concerned about. Something like the Rebellion in Harchong occurring in Desnair looks like a distinct possibility if Mahrys tries that tactic.
The more interesting question is Siddarmark's reaction. It has a population split between Temple Loyalists, adherents of the Church of Charis, and possibly a number of folks who will think of themselves as members of a Church of Siddarmark, because they don't want anything to do with Mother Church
or the Church of Charis.
______
Dennis