Krenn wrote:Which brings us back to the original thread question....
What might the Lost Testimony of Schueler actually SAY?
We await answers with bated breath...
It could leave most of the original writ intact, and ONLY accuse Chiriro of a few very specific lies, mostly occurring on or after Armageddon Reef.... or it might accuse Chiriro (gasp!) attempting to use the entire writ to subtly sabotage the idea of the scientific method...
The bit that struck me in Schueler's appearance is not only that he accused Chihiro of lying, but also stated Shan-Wei was
not the entry point for evil, and was destroyed by the betrayer for refusing to turn from her original charge to make Safehold a place men could live on, and would not compromise her mission.
The claim that Shan-Wei was an innocent victim and someone else was the real bad person would be quite enough to make the CoGA go ballistic.
It's approximately equivalent to a claim that Satan was not God's opponent, another angel was the real bad person, and Satan got blamed after the fact for stuff he didn't do. Of course, making such a claim in Christianity faces the problem of coming up with "proof" any real Christian might accept.
On Safehold, it can be done, if an Honest-to-God Archangel appears before the faithful and says it, and leaves behind a book like the master copy of the Holy Writ in the Temple where he documents his assertions. (This assumes, of course, that it
was Schueler appearing in his church, and not a sneaky high-tech IC plot inspired by Narhmann. For various reasons, I think that really was Schueler.)
It might try to redeem and agree with the Fallen and the Great Traitor, or it could just cast them as tragically misguided enemies who made a bad choice when dealing with Chihiro's lies...
One thing we don't know that I expect will be revealed at some point was the Fallen's agenda. What would they have done if they'd
won?It might limit it's doctrinal changes to rejecting the Punishment of Schueler and the worst powers of the Inquisition, or it might add some subtle additional changes, like personnel relationships with God, tolerance for heretics, things of that nature...
Enough, I think, if Schueler claims he didn't write the Punishment that appears in his book, and that it was an after the fact addition by Chihiro.
And of course, most of those "mights" assume that Schueler really did write this thing. If he DIDN'T write it, then things get really strange.
I think he did, but things are quite strange enough if he did.
Last but not least, Schueler's apparition states Shan Wei was innocent and destroyed by the betrayer for refusing to compromise, and that Chihiro lied. But he does
not, in that appearance, call Chihiro the betrayer. He just says he lied. So who he claims the real betrayer was will be something revealed in his Testimony.
Given the nature of the charges, who
could the betrayer be? The two candidates I see are Chihiro and
Langhorne, and a claim that
Langhorne overstepped his bounds and took it upon himself to modify God's Plan and was the true betrayer would
really set the cat among the pigeons.
(And thinking about it, we learned a while back that Paityr
was descended for Schueler, and Schuerer's DNA is now scattered throughout a good part of Siddarmark.
It's not clear what sort of regulations about intimate relations between command crew and colonists existed, though I'd be surprised if there weren't some. Schueler was likely on thin ice by impregnating a colonist female.
But given that he did, was he the only one? You have to wonder what other Archangels left bastards scattered around.)
______
Dennis