So, in the last scene of TFT, a certain document has been revealed to the Schulerites, in Schueler's Tomb, but the novel ends on a cliffhanger: the book itself HAS NOT YET BEEN OPENED OR READ, and thus we have virtually no information about it's contents.
What we know about it:
Ahrnahld Samsyn swallowed hard as he saw the mighty volume resting upon the rail. Saw the flickering, flowing glow of holy brilliance dancing through its gems, saw the precious metals of its cover, and knew—knew—that its pages were of that same imperishable metal, in paper-thin sheets etched with a finer script than any mortal hand could produce.
And this is how the document's deliverer chose to describe it:
“This is my Testimony,” the Archangel said. “The Testimony of Schueler, and I leave it with you so that all who see it may know I truly appeared before you, that this is truly my word. And that word, my children,” he said while Samsyn trembled before him, “is that it was not Shan-wei who Fell, but Chihiro who lied.”
A chorus of gasps washed through the cathedral, and the Archangel looked down upon the mall.
“Take that word forth with you, my children, for it is time the truth was known. Time the lies were set aside. Time for you to walk once more into the light of the purpose which brought you here.
“I know it’s frightening. I know the burden I’ve laid upon you will be heavy. But it is time, and I charge you all as my witnesses and my messengers to take that truth and proclaim it to all the Faithful.”
Now, on several other threads, speculation is rife about who the real author, editor, and deliverer of this document might be... the two obvious candidates being either the Inner Circle or Schueler. I could see good arguments in any direction, and don't yet have a strong opinion on the matter.
However.... I think we have to assume that when someone DOES open this document and read it, that it will contain actual words, in a well-written format, suitable for general publication. And if this tome is "mighty", then it probably contains several hundred pages.
I would be interested to see peoples speculation.... what might logically BE in the alleged 'Lost Testimony of Schueler' ? Where would that information have come from? how much of it could presumably be independently verified? What other documents and histories would it likely contradict, or NOT contradict, or merely subtly call into question? What idiom would it be presented in? And, finally, who would the presumed actual author/editor/compiler of this document be, and what was their presumptive goal in having this document 'revealed'?